California Penal Code section 187 PC prohibits murder, which is
“the unlawful killing of a human being or fetus with malice aforethought.”
First-degree murder comprises all premeditated killings as well as most kinds of felony murder, where someone dies during the commission of a serious crime such as robbery, carjacking, or rape. First-degree murder is punishable by 25 years to life in prison.
Meanwhile, second-degree murder is a murder that involves no premeditation. Rather, it is killing someone by engaging in extremely risky behavior that you should have known could be lethal. A conviction carries 15 years to life.
In this article, our Los Angeles criminal defense attorneys will address the following key issues regarding California murder law under 187 PC:
- 1. Elements of 187 PC
- 2. Defenses
- 3. Punishments
- 4. Other Homicide Crimes
- 5. Remedies for Victims’ Families
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Full Text of 187 PC
- Additional Reading
1. Elements of 187 PC
For you to be convicted of murder in California under 187 PC, prosecutors must prove the following three elements of the jury instructions beyond a reasonable doubt:
- You caused the death of another person (or fetus),
- You acted with malice aforethought, and
- You killed without lawful excuse or justification.1
Malice
Murder is the most aggravated type of homicide in California. What distinguishes murder from manslaughter is that murder requires malice:2
“[M]alice aforethought does not … require any ill will or hatred of the particular victim. When a defendant ‘with wanton disregard for human life, does an act that involves a high degree of probability that it will result in death,’ he acts with malice aforethought.”3
Both first- and second-degree murder require either express or implied malice. Express malice means intending to kill the victim; meanwhile, malice is implied when:
- The killing resulted from an intentional act, and
- The act’s natural consequences are dangerous to human life, and
- The killer knew of the danger to human life, and the killer acted with a conscious disregard for human life.4
First-Degree Murder
There are five roads to a first-degree murder conviction in California under 187 PC:
- By using a destructive device or explosive, a weapon of mass destruction, ammunition to penetrate metal or armor, or poison,
- By lying in wait,
- By inflicting torture pursuant to PC 206,
- By a willful, deliberate, and premeditated killing, or
- Felony murder, which is directly killing someone while committing certain felonies (discussed below).5
Examples of first-degree murder include:
- Going to someone’s house intending to kill that person.
- Waiting for someone to appear, and then killing that person.
- Using a pipe bomb to perpetrate a killing.
Capital Murder
Capital murder – also called “first-degree murder with special circumstances” in California – is first-degree murder punishable by either:
- Capital punishment (the death penalty) or
- Life in prison without the possibility of parole (“LWOP”).
Capital murder applies to more than 20 different situations that 190.2 PC lists. Some of these “special circumstances” that elevate first-degree murder to capital murder are:
- Killing for financial gain,
- Killing more than one victim,
- Killing a police officer, firefighter, prosecutor, judge, juror, or elected official,
- Killing a witness to prevent giving testimony,
- Killing because of the victim’s race, color, religion, nationality, or country of origin,
- Drive-by shooting, or
- Gang killing.6
Second-Degree Murder
Second-degree murder is also willful, but it is not deliberate, and there is no premeditation. It occurs when you unintentionally kill someone by doing something so reckless you should have known death would likely result.
Second-degree murder is any murder that does not count as first-degree murder under 187 PC.7 Examples of second-degree murder in California include:
- Shooting a gun into a crowded room and killing someone when the shooter did not intend to kill.
- A person with past DUIs drunk driving again and causing an accident that kills someone else.
- Viciously sucker-punching a smaller and inebriated person, causing the victim to fall and sustain a fatal head injury.8
PC 187 (a) PC forbids murder, which is a “malice aforethought” killing.
The Felony Murder Rule
In California, “felony murder” is killing while committing a dangerous felony. The felony murder rule applies to first- and second-degree murder:
An example is holding up a cashier and then shooting when the cashier reaches for the phone: Robbery is the felony, and killing the cashier is the murder. It does not matter that the robber did not intend for the cashier to die.
You face felony murder charges only if you:
- Were the actual killer, or
- Had the intent to kill, and you aided, abetted, counseled, commanded, induced, solicited, requested, or assisted the actual killer, or
- Were a major participant in the underlying felony, and you acted with reckless indifference to human life, or
- The victim was an on-duty law enforcement officer, and you knew – or should have known – this.
Negligent and accidental deaths that occur during felonies do not count as felony murder unless the victim was an on-duty officer.9
First-Degree Felony Murder
Under California’s felony murder rule, you face first-degree murder charges for killing during the commission of either:
- Arson,
- Robbery,
- Burglary,
- Carjacking,
- Train wrecking,
- Kidnapping,
- Mayhem,
- Torture, or
- Certain California sex crimes, including
Second-Degree Felony Murder
Under the felony murder rule, you face second-degree murder charges for killing during the commission of inherently dangerous felonies not included under the first-degree felony murder rule (listed above).11
Since there is no set list of inherently dangerous felonies, courts apply the second-degree felony murder rule case-by-case.12 The following are second-degree felony murder examples.
Manufacturing methamphetamines – People v. James
Defendant was manufacturing meth in her home-based lab. It caused an explosion which killed three of her children. The court held that making meth carried a substantial fatal risk since it involves mixing flammable substances. Therefore, the court convicted her of second-degree felony murder.13
Willfully or maliciously burning a car – People v. Nichols
Defendant was angry at his wife for cheating, so he set fire to her car in the garage. He only intended to scare her, but the fire spread to the house and killed their two children. The court held that burning a car carries a substantial fatal risk since it involves gasoline, which is flammable. Therefore, the court convicted him of second-degree felony murder.14
Killing is justified under California homicide law under certain circumstances.
2. Defenses
Here at Shouse Law Group, we have a long track record of getting murder charges reduced or dismissed in California. In our experience, the following six defense strategies have proven very effective with prosecutors, judges, and juries at getting section 187 PC charges reduced or dismissed.
1) You Acted in Lawful Self-Defense or Defense of Others
One of the most common defenses to murder charges is self-defense.15 In California, killing is justified when you reasonably believe you or others are in imminent danger of:
- Being killed,
- Suffering great bodily injury, or
- Being raped, maimed, robbed, or the victim of some other forcible and atrocious crime.16
Example: Jack is a frequent wife beater. One day, he picks up a brick, and his wife believes he is about to throw it at her. She shoots him, causing him to die from the bullet wound. Since the wife is a battered woman, there is evidence she reasonably believed she was about to suffer imminent death or great bodily injury, and she acted to prevent that from happening. This entitles her to prevail on a theory of self-defense.17
An “imperfect self-defense” (also called the “Flannel doctrine”) applies where you kill based on an honest but unreasonable belief you face imminent danger. Imperfect self-defense cannot dismiss a murder case, but it can reduce murder to voluntary manslaughter.
2) The Killing Was an Accident
Accident is a defense to 187 PC charges when you:
- Had no criminal intent to do harm, and
- Were not acting negligently, and
- Were otherwise engaged in a lawful activity at the time of the killing.18
Example: A woman shoots and kills her neighbor. She claims she only intended to scare him away, and that the gun accidentally fired. The court rules she can present the defense that it was an accidental killing.19
3) You Were Insane
California allows you to plead “not guilty by reason of insanity.” The standard for insanity is the M’Naughten test, where you or your attorney must prove you killed only because:
- You did not understand the nature of the act, or
- You could not distinguish between right and wrong.
Insanity excuses murder and can get the charge completely dismissed.20
Example: A mother drowns her five children. Clearly, this is murder, but psychiatric testimony about her postpartum psychosis shows she is insane. Her mental illness precluded malice aforethought.21
4) The Police Coerced a Confession
Police must follow proper Miranda and constitutional protections and may never coerce your confession.22 Illegal and coercive interrogation methods include:
- Making threats against you or your family,23
- Threatening you with the death penalty,24 or
- Offering more lenient treatment in exchange for a confession.25
When the police coerce an involuntary confession, the court will exclude the confession from evidence.26
Example: Detectives tell a murder suspect he can avoid first-degree murder charges, but he would need to confess to unpremeditated murder. The suspect confesses. The court later excludes the statement from evidence because it finds the police coerced the confession through a promise, which was unlawful.27
Police coercion is illegal, but it is not uncommon. There has been social science research that shows coercion has led to widespread prosecution and convictions of many innocent people.
5) The Police Committed an Illegal Search and Seizure
Courts allow searches and seizures of murder suspects’ property, but there are limits under the Fourth Amendment. Everyone has the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures.
When police cross this line, your defense lawyer can ask the judge to exclude the illegally obtained evidence from the trial. Attorneys do this through a 1538.5 motion.28
If the judge grants the motion and suppresses the evidence, the prosecutor may then have to dismiss the 187 PC charge for lack of proof.
Example: Police illegally detain and photograph a gang member. Later on, a murder takes place. An eyewitness uses the old photograph to identify the gang member, and police arrest him. Since the photo never should have been taken, the court eventually excludes the photo and ID from evidence.29
Note that even if the search itself was lawful, it may be possible to argue that the forensic evidence was tainted or that evidence was planted to frame you.
6) You Were a Victim of Mistaken Identification
Research shows that mistaken identification is the greatest cause of wrongful convictions. It leads to more convictions of innocent people than all other causes combined.30
Numerous factors detract from an eyewitness’s ability to identify a suspect:
- The stress of the encounter,
- Fixation on a weapon,
- Intoxication,
- The suspect is a different race,
- The passage of time, and
- Improper suggestion by the police.31
California prosecutors base many cases on questionable eyewitness identification. However, there are several measures criminal defense lawyers may take:
- Demanding a live lineup to see if the eyewitness really can distinguish and identify the suspect.
- Challenging the police procedures in previous photo spreads and lineups, and seeking to get the identifications excluded from evidence.
- Calling an “Eyewitness Identification Expert” at trial. The expert can explain to the jury how memory processes work, and the jury would see how common mistakes are.
The key is to demonstrate that the identification is unreliable and that a reasonable doubt exists as to the identity of the real perpetrator.
Currently, there is a moratorium on California’s death penalty.
3. Punishments
First-Degree Murder
First-degree murder carries 25 years to life in state prison.32 If it was a hate crime, the penalty is life without the possibility of parole (LWOP).33
Hate crime murder is based on the victim’s
- Race,
- Religion,
- Gender,
- Disability,
- Sexual orientation, or
- Nationality.
Capital Murder
Capital murder is California’s most serious homicide charge. The punishment is:
- The death penalty through a lethal dose of gas or intravenous injection of a lethal substance or
- Life in prison without the possibility of parole.34
On March 12, 2019, Governor Gavin Newsom announced a temporary moratorium on executions. He cited the risks of executing innocent people and how minorities are disproportionately affected. Los Angeles County prosecutors pursue the death penalty for only the “most egregious” murders.35
Second-Degree Murder
Second-degree murder carries 15 years to life in state prison,36 but some factors can increase the sentence, as the following table shows:
| Aggravating Circumstance | Second-Degree Murder Prison Sentence in California |
| You served a prior murder sentence. | Life with no possibility of parole37 |
| You shot from a vehicle, and you intended to cause serious injury. | 20 years to life |
| The victim is a peace officer. | 25 years to life |
The victim is a peace officer, and you:
| Life with no possibility of parole38 |
Additional Penalties
A murder conviction in California also subjects you to:
- An additional 10, 20 or 25 years to life in prison if you used a firearm during the murder (“in the commission of a felony”),39
- A “strike” pursuant to California’s three-strikes law,
- Sentencing enhancements if a gun is used or if the offense is gang-related,
- Victim restitution,
- A maximum $10,000 fine, and
- Loss of gun rights pursuant to the “felon with a firearm law.”40
Also, you must register for life as a tier three sex offender if you are convicted of murder while attempting to commit or committing:
- Rape,
- Sodomy,
- Lewd acts with a child under 14,
- Oral copulation with a minor, or
- Forcible penetration with a foreign object.
Learn more about the California sex registry.
Attempted murder can also result in a hefty prison sentence.
4. Other Homicide Crimes
Attempted Murder
California’s attempted murder laws apply when you:
- Take at least one direct (but ineffective) step towards killing another person (or fetus) and
- Intend to kill that person (or fetus).41
The penalty is a life sentence with the possibility of parole.42 You also face victim restitution, substantial fines, and a “strike” pursuant to California’s three-strikes law.
Voluntary Manslaughter
Prosecutors charge you with voluntary manslaughter for killing another person during a sudden quarrel or in the heat of the moment.
It is similar to first-degree murder, but the difference is that voluntary manslaughter does not involve malice. Instead, the killing is done spontaneously.43
Example: A husband walks in on his wife in bed with another man. Startled and enraged, he kills them right away in the heat of passion. This could get a murder charge reduced to manslaughter.
Voluntary manslaughter carries three, six, or 11 years in prison.44
Involuntary Manslaughter
Involuntary manslaughter is killing another:
- Without malice, and
- Without an intent to kill, but
- With conscious disregard for human life.45
Example: Defendant buys illegal drugs which he gives to his girlfriend. She overdoses and dies. Defendant did not intend to kill her, but since the drugs were dangerous, he arguably acted with a conscious disregard of human life. Therefore, he could be liable for involuntary manslaughter.
To be convicted of involuntary manslaughter, you at the time of the killing must be involved in either:
- An unlawful act (not amounting to a felony) or
- A lawful act that involves a high degree of risk of death or great bodily injury, and you fail to act with the proper caution.46
This is different from an excusable, accidental killing where you are not violating any laws or acting recklessly at the time of the killing. Involuntary manslaughter also does not generally apply to acts committed while driving a car: Those are covered by vehicular manslaughter laws.47
Involuntary manslaughter carries two, three, or four years in prison.48
The following chart compares and contrasts the California crimes of murder, voluntary manslaughter, and involuntary manslaughter.
| CALIFORNIA LAW | Murder | Voluntary Manslaughter | Involuntary Manslaughter |
| Penal Code section | PC 187 | PC 192(a) | PC 192(b) |
| Malice aforethought | Yes | No | No |
| Intent to kill | Yes | Yes | No |
| Premeditation | Yes (1st degree) / No (2nd degree) | No | No |
| Provocation or heat of passion | No | Yes | No |
| Criminal negligence | No | No | Yes |
| Sentencing | 15 years to life (2nd degree) / 25 years to life (1st degree) | 3, 6, or 11 years | 2, 3, or 4 years |
| Possible defenses | Self-defense, defense of others, insanity, accident | Self-defense, defense of others, insanity, accident | Self-defense, defense of others, insanity, accident |
Vehicular Manslaughter
Vehicular manslaughter is driving that kills another person when you:
- Drive in an unlawful way (not amounting to a felony), with or without gross negligence, or
- Drive during the commission of a lawful act that might produce death in an unlawful manner, or
- Knowingly cause the accident for financial gain (which can also be prosecuted as automobile insurance fraud).49
Vehicular manslaughter is a wobbler, which prosecutors can charge as either felonies or misdemeanors. Felony vehicular manslaughter carries two-to-10 years in prison, while misdemeanor vehicular manslaughter carries up to one year in jail.50
If you are under the influence of alcohol at the time of the killing, prosecutors would likely charge (depending on the case):
- Vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated – the least serious fatal DUI charge, or
- Gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated – a more serious crime than vehicular manslaughter because you must act with gross negligence rather than ordinary negligence, or
- DUI murder – the most serious fatal DUI charge, and it is prosecuted as second-degree murder (discussed below).
DUI Murder / Watson Murder
A fatal DUI can be second-degree murder in California. It is called DUI murder or “Watson” murder and occurs when:
- You cause an accident while intoxicated, and
- It kills another person as a result, and
- The circumstances are especially egregious.
DUI murder charges are almost always based on a second-degree, implied malice theory. The prosecutor is not alleging you intended to kill anyone. Instead, you are alleged to have:
- Intentionally committed a dangerous act,
- Knew of the danger, and
- Acted with conscious disregard for human life.
Typically, the D.A. presses DUI murder charges when you have a prior DUI conviction, but not always. Courts have upheld Watson murders even in the absence of a prior DUI in circumstances such as:
- A grossly intoxicated driver (with a blood alcohol content of 0.24%) sped away from police at 70 mph and killed someone.
- The defendant killed a family of three while driving up to 87 mph in a side-by-side “speed contest” on a residential street.
- A trucker drove a semi-trailer on a steep highway knowing his brakes were not up to the task.51
When you are convicted of DUI in California, judges typically read you a “Watson advisement” that states:
- It is extremely dangerous to human life to drive while under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs, and
- If you have a fatal DUI, California prosecutors may bring murder charges.52
The following chart compares California’s three “DUI causing death” crimes.
| CALIFORNIA “DUI WITH DEATH” CRIMES | Vehicular Manslaughter While Intoxicated | Gross Vehicular Manslaughter While Intoxicated | DUI Murder/Watson Murder |
| Statute section | 191.5(b) PC | 191.5(a) PC | 187 PC |
| Elements of the crime | Causing a fatal DUI crash while driving intoxicated and with ordinary negligence | Causing a fatal DUI crash while driving intoxicated and with gross negligence | A repeat DUI offender warned about the dangers of impaired driving causing a fatal DUI crash. |
| Maximum prison | 4 years | 10 years | Life |
| Probation possible? | Yes | Yes | No |
Murder with Gang Enhancements
With gang-related killings, prosecutors typically charge:
- PC 187 murder, as well as
- California’s street gang enhancement.
The latter is a special allegation that requires the state to prove that the murder was committed:
- At the direction of a criminal street gang, or
- For the benefit of a criminal street gang, or
- In association with a criminal street gang
If you are convicted of both murder and the gang enhancement, you may get an additional sentence of 15 years to life in prison.53
Prosecutors abuse gang enhancements by charging them any time a homicide is remotely gang-related. It increases the potential sentencing and allows prosecutors to present highly inflammatory evidence that may coax otherwise ambivalent juries to convict.
Aiding a Suicide
PC 401 aiding suicide is deliberately:
- Helping someone commit suicide or
- Encouraging or advising someone to commit suicide.54
The line between aiding suicide and murder can be blurry. Aiding suicide is providing people with the means to kill themselves, but killing people at their request is murder.
Assisting suicide is a felony carrying up to three years in prison.55
5. Remedies for Victims’ Families
Families of murder or manslaughter victims may sue for damages through two types of lawsuits:
- A “wrongful death” lawsuit, which compensates survivors for their losses; and
- A “survival” cause of action, which compensates the victim’s estate for losses sustained prior to death.
No homicide conviction is necessary to sue. Families can sue even if:
- You get acquitted at trial for the homicide, or
- The prosecution never files charges.
For instance, a jury acquitted O.J. Simpson of murder. However, the families of his victims won a civil lawsuit where the court ordered Simpson to pay $33 million in compensatory and punitive damages.56
Possible Damages
Families of murder or manslaughter victims may recover:
- Medical bills,
- Funeral expenses,
- Loss of the victim’s companionship and financial support (including “loss of consortium”), and
- Punitive damages.
If you get convicted on criminal charges, families can also seek court-ordered victim restitution.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between First-Degree and Second-Degree Murder?
The primary difference is premeditation.
-
First-Degree Murder usually requires that you weighed the decision to kill and planned it (even if only for a few moments) before acting. It also includes killings that occur using specific means (like bombs or poison) or during certain felonies (Felony Murder).
-
Second-Degree Murder is an intentional killing that was not planned or premeditated. It often happens impulsively or results from dangerous conduct that shows a “conscious disregard for human life” (such as a DUI resulting in death, known as a “Watson Murder”).
Can I get bail if I am charged with murder in California?
It is possible, but difficult. In most California counties, the standard bail schedule for murder is set at $1,000,000 to $2,000,000, and judges often deny bail entirely for “Capital Murder” cases.
However, your defense attorney can file a motion to reduce bail by arguing that you are not a flight risk or a danger to the public, or by proposing alternatives like house arrest and GPS monitoring.
How has the “Felony Murder” rule changed in California?
Previously, you could be convicted of murder if an accomplice killed someone during a felony (like a robbery), even if you did not intend for anyone to die. Senate Bill 1437 significantly limited this rule. Now, you can generally only be convicted of felony murder if you:
- Were the actual killer,
- Acted with the intent to kill (aided and abetted), or
- Were a major participant in the underlying felony and acted with reckless indifference to human life.
If you were previously convicted under the old rule, you may be eligible to have your sentence reduced.
What is the difference between Murder and Voluntary Manslaughter?
The difference is malice.
-
Murder requires “malice aforethought” (intent to kill or conscious disregard for life).
-
Voluntary Manslaughter applies when a person kills intentionally but without malice, usually because they were acting in a “heat of passion” due to a sudden quarrel or provocation, or because they had an unreasonable belief that they needed to use self-defense.
Getting a murder charge reduced to voluntary manslaughter is always a legal victory.
Full Text of 187 PC
Murder defined
(a) Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being, or a fetus, with malice aforethought.
(b) This section shall not apply to any person who commits an act that results in the death of a fetus if any of the following apply:
(1) The act complied with the former Therapeutic Abortion Act (Article 2 (commencing with Section 123400) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code) or the Reproductive Privacy Act (Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 123460) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code).
(2) The act was committed by a holder of a physician’s and surgeon’s certificate, as defined in the Business and Professions Code, in a case where, to a medical certainty, the result of childbirth would be death of the person pregnant with the fetus or where the pregnant person’s death from childbirth, although not medically certain, would be substantially certain or more likely than not.
(3) It was an act or omission by the person pregnant with the fetus or was solicited, aided, abetted, or consented to by the person pregnant with the fetus.
(c) Subdivision (b) shall not be construed to prohibit the prosecution of any person under any other provision of law.
Additional Reading
For more in-depth information, refer to these scholarly articles:
- The Stickiness of Felony Murder: The Morality of a Murder Charge – Mississippi Law Journal
- Evil and the Law of Murder – U.C. Davis Law Review
- How Should We Punish Murder – Marquette Law Review
- Rape, Murder, and Formalism: What Happens if We Define Mistake of Law – University of Colorado Law Review
- The California Supreme Court and the Felony Murder Rule: A Sisyphean Challenge – California Legal History.
Legal References:
- CALCRIM 520.
- California Penal Code section 187 PC. This section is sometimes mistakenly called “Police Code 187”.
- People v. Summers (1983) 147 Cal.App.3d 180, 184.
- CALCRIM 520; See also California Penal Code 188 PC.
- California Penal Code 189 PC.
- California Penal Code 190.2 PC et seq. This section (as well as several subsequent related sections) enumerates more than 20 “special circumstances” that subject defendants to execution or life without the possibility of parole, including discharging a firearm from a motor vehicle (otherwise known as a “drive-by” shooting), and murdering another for the benefit of a criminal street gang pursuant to Penal Code 186.22 PC. People v. Perez (2020) 9 Cal. 5th 1.
- See California Penal Code 189 PC; People v. Palomar (2020) 44 Cal. App. 5th 969. See also People v. Collins (Cal. 2025) .
- California Penal Code 246.3 PC.
- People v. Cavitt (2004) 33 Cal.4th 187, 197; Jazmine Ulloa, “California sets new limits on who can be charged with felony murder“, LA Times (September 30, 2018). California’s felony murder rule changed. The old law held that accidental killings are murder if they occur during a felony. The old law also held accomplices liable for felony murder even if they did not carry out the killing or intend to kill. On September 30, 2018, Governor Jerry Brown signed into law a revision under SB 1437. Persons convicted under the old felony murder rule have redress: They can now file a petition for resentencing based on SB 1437.
- California Penal Code 189 PC; People v. Wear, (2020) 44 Cal. App. 5th 1007.
- People v. Granados (1957) 49 Cal.2d 490.
- People v. James (1998) 62 Cal.App.4th 244, 258.
- See same at 270.
- People v. Nichols (1970) 3 Cal.3d 150
- CALCRIM 505.
- CALCRIM 505.
- Facts inspired by People v. Humphrey (1996) 13 Cal.4th 1073.
- California Penal Codes 26, 195, & 199 PC.
- Facts based on People v. Slater (App. 1 Dist. 1943) 60 Cal.App.2d 358.
- California Penal Code 25; see also People v. Horn (1984) 158 Cal.App.3d 1014, 1032; see also CALCRIM 3450.
- Facts based on State of Texas v. Andrea Yates, (2005) 171 S.W.3d 215.
- People v. Jimenez (1978) 21 Cal.3d 595, 602.
- People v. Rand (1962) 202 Cal.App.2d 668, 673; In re Shawn D. (1993) 20 Cal.App.4th 200; People v. Trout (1960) 202 Cal.App.2d 668, 674; Lynumm v. Illinois (1963) 372 U.S. 528, 531-32; Rogers v. Richmond, supra 365 U.S. 534, 549.
- People v. Hinds (1984) 154 Cal.App.3d 222, 238; People v. Jiminez (1978) 21 Cal.3d 595, 609-613; People v. McClary (1977) 20 Cal.3d 218, 229; People v. Johnson (1969) 70 Cal.2d 469, 478-79.
- People v. Hill (1967) 66 Cal.2d 536, 549.
- See Rogers v. Richmond (1961) 365 U.S. Supreme Court 534, 541.
- People v. Cahill (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 296.
- California Penal Code 1538.5 PC.
- Facts based on People v. Rodriguez (1993) 21 Cal.App.4th 232.
- See Gary Wells et al, Eyewitness Identification Procedures: Recommendations for Lineups and Photospreads, Law and Human Behavior, Vol. 22, No. 6, 1998.
- See Cutler and Penrod, Mistaken Identification, (1995) Cambridge University Press.
- California Penal Code 190 PC.
- California Penal Code 190.03 PC.
- California Penal Codes 3604 & 190.2 PC.
- Jamie Ding, L.A. County DA brings back death penalty for ‘most egregious’ murders, Los Angeles Times (March 25, 2025).
- California Penal Code 190 PC.
- California Penal Code 190.05 PC.
- See same.
- California Penal Code 12022.53 PC.
- California Penal Codes 667, 1192.7(c), 1203.1, 672, & 29800 PC.
- CALCRIM 600; People v. Mariscal (Cal. App. 2d Dist. Mar. 30, 2020) 47 Cal.App.5th 129.
- California Penal Code 664 PC.
- California Penal Code 192 PC; see also CALCRIM 570–572.
- California Penal Code 193 PC.
- CALCRIM 580–582.
- CALCRIM 580–582.
- California Penal Code 192(b) PC.
- California Penal Code 193 PC.
- California Penal Code 192(c) PC.
- California Penal Code Section 193 PC.
- People v. Johnigan (2011) 196 Cal.App.4th 1084; People v. Canizalez (2011) 197 Cal.App.4th 832; People v. Moore (2010) 187 Cal.App.4th 937; People v. Superior Court (Costa) (2010) 183 Cal.App.4th 690.
- The Watson admonition, which is on all DUI plea Tahl waiver forms, states “I understand that being under the influence of alcohol or drugs, or both, impairs my ability to safely operate a motor vehicle, and is extremely dangerous to human life to drive while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, or both. If I continue to drive while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, or both, and as a result of my driving, someone is killed, I can be charged [in California] with murder.”
- Penal Code 186.22 PC.
- Penal Code 401 PC.
- Same.
- Rufo v. Simpson (2001) 86 Cal. App. 4th 573.