In this section, our attorneys explain Nevada’s criminal laws and legal concepts, A to Z
Laws » How long does an indictment take in Nevada?
Indictments in Nevada can take hours or several weeks, depending on the case.
Most criminal felony cases never involve an indictment. Instead, the prosecutor usually submit an “information” to the judge alleging that there is probable cause to charge the defendant for a crime. Then later after the defendant is arraigned in Nevada (formally charged), the judge holds a Nevada preliminary hearing. Preliminary hearings are like a mini-trial where the prosecution has to prove that there is enough evidence to continue the case to trial.
In contrast, an indictment is like pre-arraignment preliminary hearing: The prosecutor amasses a Nevada grand jury of 16 to 20 people and presents evidence of the suspect’s alleged criminal activity. If the grand jury votes that there is enough information to prosecute, the defendant will be charged. (Note that defendants who are indicted by grand jury are not entitled to a preliminary hearing following the arraignment: The logic is that the indictment served the purpose of the preliminary hearing.)
Prosecutors usually resort to using a grand jury only in felony cases with high stakes and that may attract media attention.
The purpose of grand juries is to decide whether the prosecution has enough evidence to charge a defendant with a crime. Therefore, grand juries come at the beginning of a case, and they determine whether a case will proceed.
In contrast, the purpose of trial juries is to decide whether the prosecution has shown a defendant to be guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, trial juries factor in only when a defendant decides to go to trial (which happens rarely). And whereas grand juries determine whether a criminal case will go forward, trial juries determine how a criminal case comes to a close.
Note that grand jury proceedings are conducted in secret, and the defendant’s attorneys may not be present. In contrast, the public is usually allowed to watch jury trials, and the defendants’ attorneys are permitted to take part. Defendants are allowed to testify during both grand juries and trial juries, but defendants are advised not to testify during grand juries since they cannot have their attorneys in the room with them.
Also, note that the state selects grand jurors and trial jurors from the same pool of eligible citizens. Similar to trial juries, grand juries have a foreperson, and they make their deliberations behind closed doors.
Finally, note that trial juries also go by the names “petit jury” or “jury”.
The prosecution is required to give notice to defendants it is trying to indict, and the prosecution must permit defendants to be present at the grand jury.
If a criminal charge that was made through an information gets dismissed, prosecutors can try to bring the same charges later on through an indictment. However, this usually occurs only in very serious cases.
The purpose of grand juries is to act as a “check” on prosecutors by preventing them from bringing charges when there is inadequate evidence. In reality, though, grand juries almost always vote to let the criminal charges proceed.
A defendant’s attorney may file a writ of habeas corpus challenging the indictment. If the court grants the writ, then the indicted charges may be dismissed. However, judges usually deny these writs in order to let the charges play out in litigation.
A former Los Angeles prosecutor, attorney Neil Shouse graduated with honors from UC Berkeley and Harvard Law School (and completed additional graduate studies at MIT). He has been featured on CNN, Good Morning America, Dr Phil, Court TV, The Today Show and Court TV. Mr Shouse has been recognized by the National Trial Lawyers as one of the Top 100 Criminal and Top 100 Civil Attorneys.
In some felony cases it may be beneficial for the accused to waive the preliminary hearing. (See Penal Code 860). Although unusual, some reasons to give up the right to a preliminary examination include: it avoids preserving testimony of witnesses (especially reluctant ones), bail status might be affected if evidence shows the crime to be ...
Nevada recently passed Senate Bill 159, which prohibits knowingly selling substances containing dextromethorphan to a minor (under 18 years old) without a valid prescription. Dextromethorphan (DXM or DM) is a common ingredient in such cough suppressants as NyQuil, Robitussin, Dimetapp, Benylin DM, Mucinex DM,Camydex-20 tablets, Vicks, Coricidin, Delsym, TheraFlu, and Cheracol D. Contrary to popular belief, dextromethorphan ...
Direct and indirect evidence are both considered to be valid forms of proof in civil and criminal proceedings. Direct evidence is defined as evidence that directly proves a key fact at issue. Indirect evidence, also sometimes referred to as circumstantial evidence, is a fact or set of facts that, if true, allow a person can ...
Updated June 9, 2021 Yes. Physically handling any electronic device while driving is against Nevada law. It does not matter if the driver is not talking on the phone nor texting nor surfing the internet. Touching the phone for any purpose including to use the navigation system is illegal. Therefore, Nevada drivers who wish to ...