Every crime in California is defined by a specific code section. Our attorneys explain the law, penalties and best defense strategies for every major crime in California.
24/7 Help:
(866) 361-0010
Conspiracy Charge – How Does The Prosecutor Prove It?
Posted on
A Criminal conspiracy charge can be filed if multiple people agree to commit a crime, they intend to commit the crime, and one of them acts in furtherance of the agreement. Defendants can be liable for conspiracy even if they never act unlawfully, on their own. Depending on the state and circumstances, it can be a felony or a misdemeanor.
What is a criminal conspiracy charge?
People can be charged with criminal conspiracy if:
- they make an agreement with at least 1 other person to commit a crime,
- they intended to commit the crime, and
- there was an overt act in furtherance of that crime.
A criminal defense attorney can break down each of these components of conspiracy law.
The agreement
The agreement to commit a crime is often referred to as the essential component of a conspiracy charge.1
The agreement does not have to be in writing or even spoken out loud.2 Law enforcement does not even need to have direct evidence of its existence. The agreement can be implied from the conduct of the parties alleged to be a part of it.3 While the essential terms of the conspiracy have to be agreed upon, the precise details do not.4
The agreement does, however, have to be between at least 1 other person who intends to commit the crime. The members of the conspiracy do not have to be a part of it from its inception – they can join later on and still be liable for conspiracy.5 However, they do have to intend to commit the offense. Alleged conspirators who have only agreed with those who do not intend to commit the crime, like undercover informants, have not committed the crime of conspiracy.6
However, there is no requirement that co-conspirators have to be aware of each other’s identities, or even that they exist.7 These are often so-called “hub-and-spoke” conspiracies.
For example: Frank independently conspires with Allen, Bob, Claire, Drake, and Elaine to commit a white collar crime. Even though none of these other people know of each other, they are all co-conspirators.
An intention to commit the crime
To be liable for conspiracy, the parties to the agreement have to intend to commit the crime.
This means that parties who secretly intend to not play their part in the crime, like undercover police officers and informants, are not liable for conspiracy. It also means that defendants who were a part of the agreement but who withdrew or who agreed only as a joke are not liable.
Overt act
Generally, there has to be an overt act that furthers the objective of the conspiracy. However, conspiracy laws in a few states, like South Carolina, do not require this element.8 The overt act requirement is also missing in a small set of conspiracy laws that deal with certain crimes.9
Any act that moves the conspiracy forward satisfies this element. It does not have to be as substantial as the act necessary to amount to an attempted crime. It can be as insubstantial as making a phone call.10 The overt act also does not need to be done by the defendant – overt acts by other co-conspirators suffice.11 It does not even have to be an illegal act, so long as it furthers the conspiracy.12
Even in conspiracy cases where an overt act is not required, prosecutors frequently use it as evidence of the agreement.
What are the penalties?
The penalties of a conspiracy conviction depend on the state and on the type of criminal case the defendants conspired to commit.
In California, for example, conspiracy is a wobbler offense. It can be charged as either a felony or as a misdemeanor. It will be charged as a felony whenever the defendants conspired to commit a criminal act that is a felony. A conviction carries the same penalties as the felony that was conspired. If multiple felonies were the object of the conspiracy, a conviction carries the penalties of the most severe criminal charge or unlawful act. If the underlying crime is a misdemeanor, the conspiracy conviction would carry up to:
- 1 year in county jail, and/or
- $10,000 in fines.13
Similarly, federal conspiracy charges generally carry different penalties for felonies and misdemeanors. If the conspiracy was to commit a federal crime that is a felony, a conviction carries up to 5 years in federal prison. If the object was to commit a misdemeanor under federal law, the punishment for conspiracy is the same as the conspired misdemeanor.14
Defendants who want to avoid these penalties should strongly consider establishing an attorney-client relationship with someone from a criminal law firm.
What are some legal defenses to a conspiracy case?
There are 3 main legal defenses that defendants can raise to a conspiracy charge:
- there was no agreement,
- there was no overt act in furtherance of the agreement, and
- the defendant withdrew from the conspiracy.
However, it is not a defense that the defendant is charged with conspiracy based on an overt act by a co-conspirator who has been acquitted.15
There was no agreement
Law enforcement has to prove that there was an agreement. Raising reasonable doubts about the existence of an agreement is often an effective defense. A criminal defense lawyer can help do this.
However, a unique aspect of conspiracy charges makes this defense difficult to establish. Unlike in other cases, prosecutors in federal conspiracy cases can use out-of-court statements made by co-conspirators against the defendant.16 These statements are normally considered hearsay. But in conspiracy cases, conspirators are considered to speak and act on each other’s behalf.17 This makes these statements admissible. Therefore, prosecutors can use statements made by co-conspirators that indicate the presence of an agreement.18 Those statements can even have been made before the defendant joined the conspiracy.19
There was no overt act
When the conspiracy statute requires it, prosecutors also have to show that an overt act was made in furtherance of the conspiracy. It is not enough to merely plan to conspire and commit the crime. Someone has to take a step towards the alleged objective. Showing that this did not happen can be a strong defense.
The defendant withdrew from the conspiracy
It is also a defense that the defendant effectively withdrew from the conspiracy to commit the crime.
What amounts to an effective withdrawal from the conspiracy depends on the jurisdiction. Generally, though, the conspiracy defendant has to:
- notify his or her co-conspirators that the defendant is abandoning the conspiracy, or
- take an affirmative step of abandonment, like notifying the police of the plan.20
This often has to be done before an overt act has been committed.21
Legal References:
- Iannelli v. United States, 95 S.Ct. 1284 (1975).
- United States v. Amiel, 95 F.3d 135 (2d Cir. 1996).
- Iannelli v. United States.
- United States v. Sharif, 817 F.2d 1375 (9th Cir. 1987).
- United States v. Burchinal, 657 F.2d 985 (8th Cir. 1981).
- Sears v. United States, 343 F.2d 139 (5th Cir. 1965).
- Blumenthal v. United States, 68 S.Ct. 248 (1947).
- See South Carolina Code Annotated 16-17-410 and State v. Fleming, 133 S.E.2d 800 (1963).
- See, for example, 21 USC 846 (dealing with federal drug conspiracy).
- United States v. Fellabaum, 408 F.2d 220 (7th Cir. 1969).
- United States v. Reyes, 302 F.3d 48 (2d Cir. 2002).
- Castro v. United States, 296 F.2d 540 (5th Cir. 1961).
- California Penal Code 182 PC.
- 18 USC 371.
- United States v. Andrews, 850 F.2d 1557 (11th Cir. 1988).
- Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2)(E).
- Anderson v. United States, 94 S.Ct. 2253 (1974).
- Bourjaily v. United States, 107 S.Ct. 2775 (1987).
- United States v. Diaz, 176 F.3d 52 (2d Cir. 1999).
- United States v. Piper, 298 F.3d 47 (1st Cir. 2002).
- People v. Hill, 3 Cal.App.4th 16 (1992).
About the Author
Neil Shouse
A former Los Angeles prosecutor, attorney Neil Shouse graduated with honors from UC Berkeley and Harvard Law School (and completed additional graduate studies at MIT). He has been featured on CNN, Good Morning America, Dr Phil, Court TV, The Today Show and Court TV. Mr Shouse has been recognized by the National Trial Lawyers as one of the Top 100 Criminal and Top 100 Civil Attorneys.
Featured on
Uncategorized Blog Posts:
Most jurisdictions currently do not have a specific test for DUI of marijuana that measures the amount of the drug in a person’s system. This is in contrast to DUI cases involving alcohol, where law enforcement can administer a breath test via an alcohol breathalyzer (or conduct a blood test) to determine a driver’s Blood ...
It is illegal to lie to police in some circumstances. It is a crime to lie about your identity to a law enforcement officer during a traffic stop or while being placed under arrest. Filing a false police report is also a crime. The most serious offense, however, is perjury, which can be a felony. ...
Different states define the act of manufacturing a controlled substance differently. They all cover the act of producing an illegal drug, not just the possession of it, although possession may be a lesser included offense. However, courts and state laws disagree over how much alteration is necessary, whether manufacturing precursors counts, or whether the law ...
California no longer applies the doctrine of contributory negligence. The California Supreme Court adopted the rules of comparative negligence in 1975 after finding that contributory negligence was too harsh on accident victims. Contributory negligence had meant that victims would recover nothing if they contributed to their injuries in any way. While this deterred personal injury ...