Being arrested for a crime does not necessarily mean you will be convicted. Often we can help you get charges reduced or dismissed, and avoid jail and a criminal record.
Are juveniles prosecuted in Los Angeles County?
Prosecutors try to avoid filing charges against youths whenever possible. As of December 8, 2020, the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office (LADA) is minimizing juvenile prosecutions in favor of steering troubled youth towards rehabilitative diversion programs. This way, young people avoid Juvi while learning tools for being law-abiding young citizens.
Usually not. Prosecutors will instead refer these kids to community-based diversion programs in lieu of misdemeanor charges. If the alleged offense was a wobbler (which can be a misdemeanor or a felony), prosecutors must file charges as a misdemeanor absent a documented history of violence; furthermore, prosecutors will need approval from the DIC (Deputy in charge) to bypass diversion.
Youths who commit property damage or have minor altercations with their household will not be charged if DCFS can better serve them. And if the property damage or altercations involved the youth’s group home, foster family, or other youths, the child will not be prosecuted if the incident was reasonably related to the child’s mental health problems or trauma history.
Note that LADA has also disbanded the Abolish Chronic Truancy (ACT) unit and all other truancy interventions.
Yes, but prosecutors must file the laxest charges possible that correspond with the alleged crimes. And prosecutors may never file any enhancements.
Note that prosecutors may not file any strike offenses unless the youth is 16 or 17 years old, and the charge involves murder or forcible rape. For instance if a juvenile allegedly commits robbery, prosecutors will not charge robbery (PC 211) since it is a strike offense. Instead, the youth could face a charge of grand theft person.
Juveniles currently charged with strike offenses will have them withdrawn or vacated and replaced with non-strike offenses or otherwise dismissed.
Prosecutors will not seek juvenile detention unless the child poses a danger to others. And the detention period must end once this danger ceases. That the child is mentally ill or is homeless is not grounds for incarceration at Juvi Hall.
No, children who consensually own or send sexually explicit photos will not face child porn (PC 311) charges. Instead, youth will be steered towards programs to educate them and promote healthy sexual behavior. Prosecutors will always try to avoid situations where children face sex offender registration requirements.
No. LADA has stopped transferring juvenile cases to adult court. All cases with defendants under 18 at the time of the alleged offense will be handled within the juvenile justice system. Any pending motions to transfer juvi cases to criminal court will be withdrawn immediately.
Science shows that teenagers’ brains are not developed like adult brains. They are susceptible to peer pressure and impulsivity. And they are capable of being reformed. Therefore, it is counterproductive to punish juveniles as if they were adults. Instead, it is better for them and for society to steer troubled youth towards rehabilitative programs.
Read the LADA Special Directive 20-09 for the full policies.
A former Los Angeles prosecutor, attorney Neil Shouse graduated with honors from UC Berkeley and Harvard Law School (and completed additional graduate studies at MIT). He has been featured on CNN, Good Morning America, Dr Phil, Court TV, The Today Show and Court TV. Mr Shouse has been recognized by the National Trial Lawyers as one of the Top 100 Criminal and Top 100 Civil Attorneys.
A felony arraignment hearing is normally the first formal court appearance in criminal cases where a defendant is charged with a felony offense. In most jurisdictions, these hearings are when courts inform defendants of the crime(s) filed against them, advise defendants as to their constitutional rights, address issues of bail and release from custody, and ...
Colorado law defines aggravated animal cruelty as either 1) knowingly torturing an animal, or 2) needlessly mutilating or killing an animal. A first-offense under CRS 18-9-202 is a class 6 felony, carrying 1 to 1 ½ years in prison and/or $1,000 to $100,000 in fines, plus anger management treatment and a prohibition against having pets ...
Courts have considered the following factors as criteria for whether there exists a hostile working environment: Whether the victim belongs to a protected class Whether the conduct happened in the workplace Whether the behavior was physical or just verbal Whether there was physical contact The frequency of the behavior How severe or offensive the conduct ...
The burden of proof at a California DMV hearing is “by a preponderance of the evidence.” A preponderance of the evidence means that it is more likely than not that a person committed the violation. By contrast, prosecutors in court must prove that an accused violated a DUI law “beyond a reasonable doubt” in order ...