If you are injured in an elevator accident in California, you can file a lawsuit against those responsible for causing it. The amount of the settlement or verdict can range from a few thousand dollars to over a million dollars, depending on the extent of the injuries and the degree of negligence that led to the accident.
Possible Defendants
Depending on the facts of your elevator injury case, you may be able to sue:
- The property owner or landlord;
- The building or property manager;
- The elevator maintenance or inspection company;
- An installer, repair company, or contractor;
- The elevator or component manufacturer; and/or
- An employer whose employee negligently caused the accident.
Common Legal Grounds
Depending on the facts, your claim may be based on:
- Negligence,
- Premises liability,
- Product liability, or
- A combination of these theories.
Potential Compensation
A California elevator accident lawsuit may seek compensation for:
- Medical bills and future treatment;
- Lost wages and reduced earning capacity;
- Pain and suffering;
- Emotional distress;
- Disability or disfigurement; and/or
- Wrongful death losses when the accident is fatal.
In our experience, elevator cases often turn on technical evidence that can disappear quickly, including surveillance video, electronic fault data, inspection reports, and maintenance records. Preserving this evidence promptly is often key to obtaining a favorable lawsuit settlement.
In this article, our California elevator accident attorneys address the following key issues:
- 1. Can I sue after an elevator accident?
- 2. What if the accident was fatal?
- 3. What settlement can I get?
- 4. Can I sue for getting stuck in an elevator?
- 5. Is the building owner responsible?
- 6. Is the elevator company responsible?
- 7. How long do I have to sue?
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Additional Resources
1. Can I sue after an elevator accident?
If you are injured in an elevator accident in California, you may have grounds to bring a negligence lawsuit against the:
- Property owner;
- Elevator maintenance company;
- Engineer;
- Architect; and/or
- Building maintenance company.
To show the defendant was negligent, you have to prove:
- The defendant(s) owed you a duty of care;
- The defendant(s) breached the duty of care through negligent action or inaction; and
- The defendant’s negligence was a substantial factor in causing the harm or death.1
In some cases, an employee may be responsible for causing the accident but does not have enough money to cover your damages. However, under “respondeat superior” laws, the employer may be liable for an employee’s negligence.2
Example: Cameron works for Rusty’s Elevator Maintenance. He tried fixing an apartment building elevator, but it was still a couple of inches from level with the floor when the doors opened. He decided to quit for the day when a resident tripped on it and hit her head. Under California’s vicarious liability laws, Rusty’s Elevator Maintenance may be liable for Cameron’s negligence.
Even if you were partly responsible for causing the accident, you may still be able to claim damages under California’s “comparative fault” law. Your payout would just be reduced by your percentage of fault.3
2. What if the accident was fatal?
When an elevator accident results in someone’s death in California, the surviving family members may be able to file a wrongful death claim.4 The next-of-kin can seek damages for:
- Funeral and burial costs;5
- Loss of financial support;6
- Loss of service;7
- Loss of companionship;
- Loss of support; and
- Loss of affection.
Example: The property manager of a building turns off the wrong elevator, causing the engineer working in the building to fall to her death. A jury finds the property manager liable and awards the engineer’s spouse and children damages that include funeral costs, the loss of earnings the engineer would have brought to the family, and an award for the loss of support the spouse and children would no longer have.
3. What settlement can I get?
In an elevator accident lawsuit settlement in California, we would seek compensatory damages to cover your:
- Medical bills,
- Physical therapy,
- Long-term care,
- Medication and medical supplies,
- Lost wages,
- Loss of future income,
- Emotional distress, and
- Pain and suffering.
There are several possible at-fault parties following an elevator accident.
4. Can I sue for getting stuck in an elevator?
Although getting stuck in an elevator rarely causes physical harm, you can sue in California for negligent infliction of emotional distress if you suffered serious emotional distress as a result of the defendant’s negligence. “Serious emotional distress,” may be found where a reasonable person would be unable to cope with the mental stress under the circumstances adequately.8
Example: A building manager flips the wrong breaker and the elevator stops, causing Annie who is trapped inside to panic until she is discovered the next morning. Here, Annie has decent grounds to sue the building manager for negligent infliction of emotional distress. Getting stuck in an elevator overnight may be difficult for an ordinary person to handle mentally.
Elevator problems can injure or substantially restrict residents even without a catastrophic fall. In 2026, Oakland and several tenants sued the owner of a 98-unit apartment building after a 52-day elevator outage allegedly stranded elderly and disabled residents and required repeated fire-department rescues.9
5. Is the building owner responsible?
Under California premises liability laws, property owners owe a duty of care to visitors and customers to keep the property safe from dangerous conditions.10 Therefore when an elevator accident occurs, the building owner may be liable if they were negligent in the use or maintenance of the property.
Example: Scott owns a small office complex and manages the property himself. One day Tina takes the elevator when the doors close on her, breaking her arm. Since Scott is responsible for the property, he may be liable for Tina’s injuries if a jury determines Scott was negligent in maintaining the property.
Note that a tenant may be able to sue a landlord for elevator injuries that occur at an apartment building.
6. Is the elevator company responsible?
The elevator manufacturer may be liable for a defective elevator even if no individual at the elevator company was negligent. Under California’s products liability laws, whoever designs, manufactures, or sells a defective product is strictly liable for injuries caused by that product.11
Example: Sherman Trees Building Supply Company sells Brutus brand elevators. After an elevator malfunctions and causes injuries, an engineering expert finds the accident was caused by a Brutus manufacturing defect. Under California product liability laws, Sherman Trees may still be liable for the accident even though they were unaware of the defect.
7. How long do I have to sue?
The California statute of limitations for most elevator injury lawsuits is two years from the date of the injury. Different and substantially shorter deadlines can apply when a state or local government owns or operates the building—generally requiring a government claim within six months.
Elevator cases should be investigated well before the filing deadline. Surveillance recordings may be erased, electronic fault information may be overwritten, and the elevator may be repaired before an expert can inspect it. We therefore try to preserve the equipment, maintenance records, prior complaints, inspection reports, and other technical evidence as soon as possible.
If you are the victim of an elevator accident, you may be able to file a personal injury lawsuit seeking damages.
Frequently Asked Questions
What causes elevator accidents in California?
Elevator accidents may result from mechanical failures, defective components, faulty electrical systems, improper installation, inadequate maintenance, or unsafe conditions around the elevator. Examples include doors closing unexpectedly, an elevator stopping above or below the floor, sudden drops or stops, defective sensors, and failures involving cables, brakes, or control systems.
In our experience, the way the accident felt to the passenger does not always reveal what actually failed. We need maintenance records, inspection reports, surveillance video, service-call histories, and an expert’s examination to determine whether the problem originated with the equipment, its installation, or its maintenance.
Can an elevator installer or contractor be liable for an accident?
Yes. An elevator installer, repair contractor, or other service provider may be liable when negligent installation, inspection, maintenance, or repair contributes to an injury. Depending on the evidence, liability may extend to several parties, including the property owner, property manager, general contractor, elevator contractor, maintenance company, manufacturer, or component supplier.
In cases we handle, we do not assume the company whose name appears inside the elevator is the only responsible party. Contracts, work orders, permits, and service records can show which company controlled the particular part of the elevator that malfunctioned.
What should I do after being injured in an elevator accident?
You should obtain medical care, report the accident to the property owner or building manager, and preserve as much evidence as reasonably possible. This may include photographing the elevator, floor alignment, doors, warning signs, permit, and visible injuries; identifying witnesses; requesting a copy of the incident report; and keeping your medical and expense records.
We tell clients to report exactly what happened without guessing about the mechanical cause or minimizing their symptoms. Elevator conditions can be repaired or altered quickly, so prompt documentation and a preservation request may be critical to securing surveillance footage, electronic fault data, inspection reports, and maintenance records.
Does California require elevators to be inspected and permitted?
Generally, yes. Elevators subject to California jurisdiction ordinarily must have a current permit to operate, and a passenger-elevator permit or copy must be conspicuously posted in the car.
Elevator owners are generally responsible for arranging periodic state inspections and correcting unsafe conditions identified by the Division of Occupational Safety and Health’s Elevator Unit. Certain private-residence and limited residential elevators are treated differently.
In our experience, an expired permit, an unresolved correction order, or a history of repeated inspection problems can be important evidence, although one regulatory violation does not automatically establish liability. We investigate both the state records and the building’s private maintenance history because they may reveal different warning signs.
What evidence determines elevator accident liability?
An injured plaintiff generally must prove that a defendant’s wrongful conduct was a substantial factor in causing the injury. Relevant evidence may include inspection and permit records, maintenance contracts, repair invoices, service-call logs, prior complaints, incident reports, surveillance recordings, electronic fault codes, witness statements, and evidence concerning the elevator’s design or components.
In our experience, these cases often turn on technical evidence that is controlled by the building owner or elevator company. We therefore try to identify every potentially responsible company early and preserve the elevator’s records and electronic data before information is overwritten or the equipment is repaired.
Is an expert needed in an elevator accident case?
Expert testimony may be necessary when determining whether an elevator was defectively designed, improperly installed, inadequately maintained, or repaired below the applicable standard of care. An elevator or engineering expert may inspect the equipment, analyze its operating and maintenance history, and explain how a particular failure caused the accident.
From what we have seen, the expert analysis can also help separate a genuine mechanical failure from explanations offered after the accident. This is important when multiple companies blame one another or claim that the elevator was operating normally when they inspected it later.
Additional Resources
Refer to the following for elevator safety tips:
- Elevator Safety – Guide by University of California, Irvine.
- Elevator and Escalator Safety – Newsletter by County of Riverside Human Resources Safety Division.
- The Do’s and Don’ts of Elevator Safety – Article by the National Safety Council.
- Tips for Riding Elevators Safely – Information by Otis, a leading elevator manufacturer.
- Elevator Safety Tips for Workers and Riders – Article by Safe Work Insider.
Legal References:
- California Civil Jury Instructions (CACI) 400. See also California Civil Code section 1714(a) (“Everyone is responsible, not only for the result of his or her willful acts, but also for an injury occasioned to another by his or her want of ordinary care or skill in the management of his or her property or person.”)
- Perez v. Van Groningen & Sons, Inc. (1986) 41 Cal.3d 962, 967 (“Under the doctrine of respondeat superior, an employer is vicariously liable for his employee’s torts committed within the scope of the employment.”)
- California Civil Jury Instructions (CACI) 405. See also California Civil Jury Instructions (CACI) 406. (“… you must then decide how much responsibility each has by assigning percentages of responsibility to each person listed on the verdict form. The percentages must total 100 percent.”)
- California Code of Civil Procedure 377.60 (“A cause of action for the death of a person caused by the wrongful act or neglect of another may be asserted by any of the following persons or by the decedent’s personal representative on their behalf: (a) The decedent’s surviving spouse, domestic partner, children, and issue of deceased children, or, if there is no surviving issue of the decedent, the persons, including the surviving spouse or domestic partner, who would be entitled to the property of the decedent by intestate succession.”)
- Vander Lind v. Superior Court (1983) 146 Cal.App.3d 358.
- See Allen v. Toledo (1980) 109 Cal.App.3d 415.
- See California Civil Jury Instructions (CACI) 3921.
- See California Civil Jury Instructions (CACI) 1620. (Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress—Direct Victim—Essential Factual Elements). Molien v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals (1980) 27 Cal.3d 916
- Davis Cuffe, Oakland sues landlord after 52-day elevator outage stranded tenants, San Francisco Chronicle (August 12, 2026).
- California Civil Jury Instructions (CACI) 1000. Premises Liability. Essential Factual Elements.
- Soule v. GM Corp. (1994) 8 Cal.4th 548, 560 (“A manufacturer, distributor, or retailer is liable in tort if a defect in the manufacture or design of its product causes injury while the product is being used in a reasonably foreseeable way.”). See CACI Series 1200 — Products Liability.