California’s DUI laws can be complex and confusing. In this section, our attorneys break down the rules and explain the process.
Call or Message Us 24/7
Criminal defense attorneys draw upon several legal strategies to help drivers win at a DMV administrative hearing. These include showing
Counsel can also focus on the driver and show that the motorist:
Note that a state’s Department of Motor Vehicles conducts a DMV DUI hearing to initiate the suspension of people’s driving privileges after they have been arrested for DUI and either:
This type of suspension is often referred to as an “administrative per se” suspension.
Police officers must have probable cause that a driver was driving while intoxicated to detain the motorist for the offense.
This means a person arrested for the crime can win at a DMV hearing if the party’s DUI lawyer shows that the arresting officer did not have probable cause.
A DUI attorney can argue any number of reasons why an officer lacked probable cause for an arrest. For example, the lawyer could establish a DUI defense by saying that:
If a person refuses to submit to a chemical test or breath test (via a breathalyzer), then the officer must advise the driver that his/her driver’s license will be automatically suspended for one year.
Further, this admonition is in writing and the officer is supposed to read it word for word. If the officer fails to do this, the person faced with the DUI arrest could win at the DMV hearing.
Note that officers make numerous drunk driving arrests and sometimes:
Any of these actions could lead a DMV hearing officer to set aside a license suspension.
Most jurisdictions say that the DMV can only suspend a person’s driving privileges in a DUI case if the driver was arrested for the crime and either:
Motorists arrested for the offense, then, can win at a DMV hearing by showing their blood alcohol concentration test results were under .08%.
Drivers will prevail at a DMV hearing if they, or their defense lawyers, show that they were not driving at the time the police made the arrest.
If the police did not personally observe an arrestee driving, then a hearing officer should set aside a license suspension provided that:
Consider, for example, a person that gets behind the wheel of a car while drunk but decides to “sleep it off” rather than drive. Here, the person is not guilty of driving under the influence because he/she was not technically driving. As a result, the DMV should not suspend the person’s license.
Drivers will win at a DMV hearing if they show that they complied with authorities and gave a blood or breath test. This is provided that the test results show that the drivers were not intoxicated.
For example, drivers can show that they:
Any of these showings should lead to a hearing officer setting aside a suspension.
California law says that the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles can initiate the suspension of driving privileges if someone was arrested for DUI and:
Following a DUI arrest, the arresting officer provides the driver with a “Notice of Suspension.” This is a document that notifies the motorist placed under arrest that:
A motorist does have the right to challenge this suspension by requesting a DMV administrative hearing. The driver, though, must make this request within 10 days from the date of the arrest.[iii]
If a DMV hearing takes place, the meeting is conducted at a DMV office and is run by a “hearing officer.” This officer is a DMV employee that typically has no legal background.[iv]
A driver attending a hearing can challenge a suspension by raising any of the arguments discussed above.
Note, though, that the Department can go ahead and suspend a person’s license if it proves that:
Unlike at a trial for a DUI, the Department does not have to prove these issues “beyond a reasonable doubt.” The standard of proof at these hearings is a lesser standard known as “by a preponderance of the evidence.” The DMV satisfies this standard if it shows that the above issues are more likely than not to be true.
[ii] See same.
[iii] See same.
A former Los Angeles prosecutor, attorney Neil Shouse graduated with honors from UC Berkeley and Harvard Law School (and completed additional graduate studies at MIT). He has been featured on CNN, Good Morning America, Dr Phil, The Today Show and Court TV. Mr Shouse has been recognized by the National Trial Lawyers as one of the Top 100 Criminal and Top 100 Civil Attorneys.
Community service is a standard sentencing term in many Colorado criminal cases, including DUI. Typically the court orders the defendant to complete a certain number of hours of useful public service by a certain date as a term of probation. And as long as the defendant completes the requisite number of community service hours and ...
If you walk out of a California restaurant or bar without paying your bill – “dine and dash” as it is often called – you are committing a crime and could land in jail. California has a specific criminal statute that deals with “dine and dash” situations, though it does not refer to it as ...
There are 3 possible consequences of a felony probation violation: The judge can revoke probation and send the probationer to jail or prison, or modify the terms of probation to make them stricter, or reinstate probation under its original terms. While the judge has great discretion at the probation violation hearing, the type of violation ...
In California, Uber is facing 4 different types of lawsuit claims: liability for car accidents caused by its drivers, claims that Uber drivers sexually assaulted passengers, individual labor claims by drivers, and a class action over Uber’s misclassification of its drivers as independent contractors. Some demand compensation for personal injuries. Others demand compensation for Uber’s ...