Probable cause is a key concept in American constitutional law. Under the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, law enforcement officers need probable cause to arrest a suspect for a crime–including California DUI. Probable cause can be roughly defined as a reasonable belief that a crime has been committed, based on objective facts.
But in the landmark case of Terry v. Ohio (1968), the United States Supreme Court held that something less than probable cause is needed for a traffic stop–including a traffic stop for suspected DUI. The Terry standard is usually described as “reasonable suspicion.”
But “reasonable suspicion” is really not that dissimilar from “probable cause.” It also needs to be based on objective facts that would lead a reasonable person to suspect that a crime was taking place. Like “probable cause,” it can’t just be a hunch or a “bad feeling.” An officer can’t pull you over for DUI because he or she had a “bad feeling” about your car.
One way of characterizing the difference between probable cause and reasonable suspicion is that probable cause is a reasonable belief that a crime has taken place, whereas reasonable suspicion is just what it sounds like: a suspicion that a crime may be taking place.
Police also need reasonable suspicion to conduct a DUI investigation (e.g., to administer field sobriety tests)–but the standard there is somewhat higher than what’s required to pull you over for DUI. In other words, there must be more concrete signs that you might be under the influence for the officer to proceed with an investigation.
And officers do still need probable cause to arrest you for DUI.
It’s also important to note that the probable cause/reasonable suspicion does not apply to DUI sobriety checkpoints. Officers may pull you over at these checkpoints even without any reason to believe you may be DUI, as long as the checkpoints are conducted in accordance with certain legal requirements.
About the Author
A former Los Angeles prosecutor, attorney Neil Shouse graduated with honors from UC Berkeley and Harvard Law School (and completed additional graduate studies at MIT). He has been featured on CNN, Good Morning America, Dr Phil, The Today Show and Court TV. Mr Shouse has been recognized by the National Trial Lawyers as one of the Top 100 Criminal and Top 100 Civil Attorneys.
Retrograde extrapolation is a way to estimate a DUI suspect’s blood alcohol content (BAC). Police use the method to calculate what someone’s BAC was, hours before they were tested. Retrograde extrapolation is significant because it is often inaccurate. Suspects accused of driving under the influence can challenge the process and defend against a DUI charge. ...
While most California DUI cases resolve before trial, some proceed to a jury trial (as opposed to a court, judge, or “bench” trial). And because DUI trials are among the most common types of California misdemeanor trials, there are definitely some routine practices that you can expect to see. 1. What are some routine practices ...
A doctor gave you a legal prescription for Adderall for your ADHD. But you were later arrested for DUI after taking a dose. Can this really happen? Yes. You can be charged and convicted for DUI if you take a drug, including Adderall, and it impairs your ability to safely operate a motor vehicle. This ...
There is no right or wrong answer. Both the Colorado DUI breath test and the Colorado DUI blood test have pros and cons in Colorado DUI cases, as discussed below. People who are arrested for drunk driving in Colorado may elect to take a breath or blood test. Whatever the suspect chooses to do, people ...