California’s DUI laws can be complex and confusing. In this section, our attorneys break down the rules and explain the process.
Call or Message Us 24/7
Police don’t actually need “probable cause” to pull you over for California DUI. But they do need “reasonable suspicion”–which in practice is hard to distinguish from “probable cause.”
Probable cause is a key concept in American constitutional law. Under the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, law enforcement officers need probable cause to arrest a suspect for a crime–including California DUI. Probable cause can be roughly defined as a reasonable belief that a crime has been committed, based on objective facts.
But in the landmark case of Terry v. Ohio (1968), the United States Supreme Court held that something less than probable cause is needed for a traffic stop–including a traffic stop for suspected DUI. The Terry standard is usually described as “reasonable suspicion.”
But “reasonable suspicion” is really not that dissimilar from “probable cause.” It also needs to be based on objective facts that would lead a reasonable person to suspect that a crime was taking place. Like “probable cause,” it can’t just be a hunch or a “bad feeling.” An officer can’t pull you over for DUI because he or she had a “bad feeling” about your car.
One way of characterizing the difference between probable cause and reasonable suspicion is that probable cause is a reasonable belief that a crime has taken place, whereas reasonable suspicion is just what it sounds like: a suspicion that a crime may be taking place.
Police also need reasonable suspicion to conduct a DUI investigation (e.g., to administer field sobriety tests)–but the standard there is somewhat higher than what’s required to pull you over for DUI. In other words, there must be more concrete signs that you might be under the influence for the officer to proceed with an investigation.
And officers do still need probable cause to arrest you for DUI.
It’s also important to note that the probable cause/reasonable suspicion does not apply to DUI sobriety checkpoints. Officers may pull you over at these checkpoints even without any reason to believe you may be DUI, as long as the checkpoints are conducted in accordance with certain legal requirements.
A former Los Angeles prosecutor, attorney Neil Shouse graduated with honors from UC Berkeley and Harvard Law School (and completed additional graduate studies at MIT). He has been featured on CNN, Good Morning America, Dr Phil, The Today Show and Court TV. Mr Shouse has been recognized by the National Trial Lawyers as one of the Top 100 Criminal and Top 100 Civil Attorneys.
Drug recognition experts (DREs) are not required to arrest people for the Colorado crime of driving under the influence of drugs (DUID) under 42-4-1301(1)(a). However, it is typical for Colorado police to involve a DRE anytime they suspect someone of driving while high. What is a drug recognition expert? Drug recognition experts are police who ...
California DUI penalties certainly put defendants into tight spots. On the one hand, your driver’s license will be suspended if you are convicted of DUI. On the other hand, you also will be required to attend an in-person alcohol education program known as “DUI school” for anywhere from three to 30 months. But how can ...
Hypoglycemia–the physical condition that results when your blood sugar is too low–is definitely relevant to a DUI defense in Nevada. First of all, hypoglycemia is a common occurrence in people who have diabetes–and diabetes is a common medical defense to DUI charges. Diabetes can lead to the physical condition known as ketosis, which can result ...
There is no such thing as a hopeless California driving under the influence (DUI) case. No matter what the allegations against you are, there will always be a promising DUI defense strategy that you can try. The prosecution may allege that you drove with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.20% (well over the legal ...