California’s DUI laws can be complex and confusing. In this section, our attorneys break down the rules and explain the process.
DUI Laws A to Z
California’s DUI laws can be complex and confusing. In this section, our attorneys break down the rules and explain the process.
DUI Penalties
The impact of a DUI conviction can haunt a person for years to come. But a good attorney can often get penalties reduced…and sometimes even get the case dismissed
DMV & Licenses
A good DUI attorney may be able to get the license suspension reduced, or even avoided altogether
24/7 Help:
(855) 999-7755
Please note: Our firm only handles criminal and DUI cases, and only in California. We do not handle any of the following cases:
And we do not handle any cases outside of California.
Call Us NowPosted on
Studies have failed to show that field sobriety tests (FSTs) are unreliable measures of whether a motorist is driving under the influence of marijuana (DUI). Nevertheless, law enforcement continues using them to prosecute these cases, often in tandem with other tests, like blood, urine, or saliva. A good defense lawyer can raise reasonable doubts about the results of any of these tests.
Several studies have shown that field sobriety tests are unreliable when detecting marijuana impairment in a driver.
One study involved participants who ingested delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). Their THC levels were monitored as they performed FSTs. The study concluded that the FSTs were ineffective in determining the participant’s THC level or whether they were impaired.[1]
Another study gave 184 marijuana users either a placebo or a dose of THC. Police officers then gave the participants FSTs to determine whether they were impaired. The law enforcement officers’ findings were that:
The high rate of FST failure by the placebo group led to the conclusion that, without other indicators, FSTs were insufficient for determining marijuana impairment.[2]
Yes, police in California and elsewhere still use FSTs when they have a reasonable suspicion that you are driving while under the influence of marijuana.
The DUI attorneys at our law firm have found that, in many cases, police use FSTs because they do not have many other methods to turn to. It is well understood that THC can impair the brain and inhibit your motor functions. This impairs your ability to drive a motor vehicle. However, the level of THC required to produce impairment is unsettled. Furthermore, no devices accurately detect THC in your body at the moment of testing, rather than latent THC from days or weeks before. This leaves police who suspect that you are driving while under the influence of marijuana with few other options than FSTs.
When using FSTs to detect marijuana impairment, police lean heavily on those that test your:
Our criminal defense attorneys and DUI lawyers have found that police tend to use the following 2 FSTs most often:
Both are standardized by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).
Failing either of these can prove that you are too impaired to drive. They are often used to establish probable cause to make an arrest. Unfortunately, many FST failures are due to other, unrelated medical conditions.
In the one-leg stand test, you have to:
The officer will look for the following 4 signs of impairment:
During the walk-and-turn test, you have to:
There are 8 signs of impairment that the officer will be looking for:
When police suspect that you are impaired by marijuana, they may also turn to other tests. Common ones include:
Typically, blood and urine tests can only be done after making a DUI arrest during a traffic stop. These test your bodily fluids for THC.
Saliva swabs have become increasingly common because of their portability. They also claim to be able to detect other controlled substances in addition to THC, such as:
However, THC is known to remain in your saliva for up to 3 days after you have ingested it. Stale THC can still show up on test results, putting you in legal jeopardy even though you are not impaired by it.
There are also so-called “marijuana breathalyzers” that claim to detect THC on your breath. These are supposed to act similarly to how breath tests measure your blood alcohol concentration or blood alcohol content (BAC) in drunk driving cases. However, unlike for breath tests that measure the influence of alcohol against the state’s legal limit, marijuana breathalyzers have struggled to produce reliable results.[3]
Generally, no. Most states, including California, have implied consent laws covering only chemical tests. FSTs are not chemical in nature. If a police officer requests that you get out of your car for a field sobriety test, you can refuse to do so without getting an automatic driver’s license suspension from the DMV.
A DUI defense lawyer will understand the numerous difficulties that law enforcement faces when investigating marijuana DUIs. There are many ways to raise reasonable doubts about whether you were too impaired to drive. This can weaken the prosecutor’s case and may even lead to your DUI charge getting dropped. You can also move for it to be dismissed.
At the very least, establishing an attorney-client relationship and getting the legal advice of a DWI defense lawyer from a reputable law office can help you understand your rights and protect your interests, often by reducing the length of a potential prison term or jail time.
Legal References
[1] National Institute of Justice, “Field Sobriety Tests and THC Levels Unreliable Indicators of Marijuana Intoxication,” (April 5, 2021).
[2] T Marcotte, A Umlauf, D Grelotti, “Evaluation of Field Sobriety Tests for Identifying Drivers Under the Influence of Cannabis: A Randomized Clinical Trial,” JAMA Psychiatry 2023;80(9):914-923 (August 2, 2023).
[3] Chris Roberts, “Study: Sure Looks Like ‘Marijuana Breathalyzers’ Don’t Work – And May Never Work,” Forbes (December 31, 2021).
A former Los Angeles prosecutor, attorney Neil Shouse graduated with honors from UC Berkeley and Harvard Law School (and completed additional graduate studies at MIT). He has been featured on CNN, Good Morning America, Dr Phil, The Today Show and Court TV. Mr Shouse has been recognized by the National Trial Lawyers as one of the Top 100 Criminal and Top 100 Civil Attorneys.