California Vehicle Code section 23152(a) penalizes drivers who drive under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs. Prosecution for a California DUI is pretty much the same whether drugs or alcohol are charged. The major difference lies in the DUI investigation.
In this article, our "driving under the influence of drugs" (DUID) attorneys will provide a comprehensive guide to understanding this offense. Topics that will be addressed include:
Driving Under the Influence of Drugs -- California Vehicle Code Section 23152(a) VC
DUI with Drugs -- What the Cops Look For
How Does the Prosecutor Prove that I was DUID Under California Vehicle Code 23152(a)?
How Do I Defend Against a California DUI of Drugs Charge Under California Vehicle Code 23152(a) VC?
If after reading this article you would like more information, we invite you to contact us at one of our conveniently located local DUI law offices.
California Vehicle Code 23152(a) VC prohibits driving under the influence of drugs. "Drugs" means any substance or combination of substances, other than alcohol, which could affect your central nervous system, brain, or muscles.
You are driving under the influence of drugs (DUID) if "your physical or mental abilities are impaired to such a degree that you no longer have the ability to drive with the caution characteristic of a sober person of ordinary prudence under the same or similar circumstances".
It is irrelevant whether the drugs were legal or illegal, prescription or over-the-counter. The only issue in a California DUID case is whether the drugs affected your ability to safely drive your car. On that note, the way you drove isn't conclusive of whether you were DUI...it's just one factor that the jury may take into consideration.
Unlike a California DUI involving alcohol under California Vehicle Code 23152(b), DUID imposes no "per se" limit (such as a maximum BAC level) to quantify when you are "under the influence". In that respect, "DUI drugs" is actually very similar to an alcohol related DUI under California Vehicle Code 23152(a)...both rely on subjective, personal observations rather than science.
A California "DUI with drugs" investigation typically begins when the investigating officer believes you are DUI despite a low or nonexistent breath alcohol concentration (BAC) level. Although protocol for this varies among law enforcement agencies, police usually call in a "DRE".
A DRE or Drug Recognition Evaluator is a law enforcement officer with special training to identify when a DUI suspect is under the influence of narcotics. The DRE program started in the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD), is now run by the California Highway Patrol (CHP).
In California, the DRE takes over your DUI investigation once he/she arrives. The DRE conducts a 12-step evaluation that includes:
The DRE's evaluation usually takes place in a well-lit, controlled area (for example, at a police station, rather than roadside where a typical DUI investigation takes place).
Like an alcohol related DUI, the arresting officer will begin by testifying about your perceived impairment.the unsafe manner in which you drove, your physical appearance, and your FST performance. Everything you did "wrong" will be highlighted for the judge and jury.
The arresting officer will surely testify that you weren't "driving with the caution characteristic of a sober person". He/she will also, no doubt, testify that you exhibited the "objective signs of intoxication". These signs include:
Testimony that you "failed to perform your FSTs as explained and demonstrated" will also be included.
Unlike a DUI involving alcohol, the breath test results will not be introduced to corroborate this testimony. The arresting officer will explain that those results were much lower than he/she would have predicted.which is why the officer requested a DRE.
*When a DRE isn't available or isn't part of your local law-enforcement's team, a DUID becomes more difficult to prove. If the arresting officer isn't trained in drug recognition, a California DUI of drugs attorney may be able to convince the judge to exclude testimony about your alleged drugged impairment. Without that testimony, your charges would likely be reduced, if not entirely dismissed.
Part of the DRE's training includes lessons on how to testify in court. The local city or district attorney's office works with these officers to ensure they know how to testify persuasively. As a result, the DRE comes across very professional and polished.
The DRE's testimony comprises the bulk of the prosecution's case. The DRE will begin by testifying, at length, about his/her training and qualifications that make him/her an "expert" in drug recognition. The DRE will also testify about his/her three major responsibilities:
The DRE will testify, in detail, about the 12-step process noted above. Steps 11 and 12 are critical to the prosecution and will be emphasized. Step 11 is where the DRE states what category of drugs he/she believes you were impaired by. Step 12 ultimately reveals what drugs were in your system on the date you were arrested.
Under step 11, the DRE will indicate whether you were impaired by:
Under step 12, the toxicology screen lists the drugs that were "detected" in your system. The screen typically doesn't reveal the amount of drugs detected, just whether you tested positive or negative for their presence.
There are a number of California DUI defenses that may be applicable to any DUI, whether alcohol- or drug-related. These types of defenses will always be explored by a California DUID defense attorney.
These defenses include:
With respect to a California drugged driving case, specific defenses exist that your California DUID lawyer may additionally argue:
This is, perhaps, the biggest defense to a California DUID case. As previously mentioned, the toxicology screen typically reveals a drug's presence, not its quantity.
When levels can be detected, many prosecution criminalist expert witnesses won't even testify about those levels. because there is no scientific correlation between drug amount and one's impairment.as tolerance and individual variation play a big role in that determination.
"Tolerance" is when the body builds up immunity to drugs or alcohol. Someone who regularly uses a particular drug will need more of the drug to feel the same effects as someone who rarely uses the same drug.
Drugs all have different life spans that range from hours to months, depending on different factors. Your
- Height,
- Weight,
- Metabolism, and
- Tolerance
all affect how long you will be under the influence of a drug and how long it will remain in your system.
Example: John is stopped by Officer Bill for speeding on the Ventura Freeway. Since the results of John's breath test don't confirm Officer Bill's suspicion that John is DUI of alcohol, he requests a DRE. The DRE determines that Bill is under the influence of marijuana.Although John appeared a "bit out of it", he hadn't used marijuana in several days.he was just emotionally and physically exhausted. The results of his blood test, however, confirmed he had marijuana in his system, which supported the prosecution's theory that he was DUI of marijuana. But,John's Van Nuys DUID defense lawyer would call an expert to testify that marijuana can remain in a person's body anywhere from five days to six months, depending on how frequently the person uses. He might also testify that the evidence linking marijuana to driving impairment is insignificant.¹
Despite the fact that the arresting officer and DRE testified that you displayed signs of impairment, a California DUID attorney can challenge that testimony. For example:are all innocent explanations that might justify your appearance.all issues that have nothing to do with drug impairment.
- Fatigue,
- Allergies,
- Sickness,
- Certain medical conditions, and
- Nerves
Nystagmus (the involuntary jerking of the eye) naturally occurs in a certain percentage of the population. Pupil size changes because of nerves, excitement, darkness, and light. Poor balance may be due to an old injury.
Referring back to John's example above -- John had been having a very rough time at home (his mother was terminally ill, and he was going through a divorce). His sheer exhaustion was mistaken for impairment.
The bottom line is this.potentially damaging testimony can always be challenged!
Like anything else, blood and urine test results are subject to numerous errors:As John Murray, one of Los Angeles's top DUI attorneys states, "California drugged driving cases have inherent problems, since there is no "scientific" way to prove that someone is under a drug's influence. I've seen many people wrongly arrested for this crime based on overzealous officers, erroneous test results, and the mistaken belief that a drug's presence is necessarily indicative of impairment."
- Contaminated medical equipment,
- Improper blood draws (poorly trained flabotomists),
- Improper storage of the samples, and/or
- Improper handling of the samples may invalidate the test results.
There is no easy way to answer this question, since California DUID sentencing varies a great deal. Factors such as (1) whether you have prior DUIs, (2) the circumstances of your case, and (3) your criminal history will determine your punishment.
The following are guidelines for a "straight forward" first-time DUID offense:
There are two additional points regarding DUID penalties and sentencing that must be addressed:
California Health and Safety Code 11550 requires a mandatory 90-day minimum county jail sentence. However, unlike driving under the influence of drugs, this charge allows a first-time offender to participate in a drug diversion program under California Penal Code 1000 in lieu of that jail sentence.
If you would like more information or would like to discuss your case in confidence, we invite you to contact us at one of our conveniently located Southern California local DUI law offices.
Narcotics Anonymous:
Provides a recovery process and support network to help recovering drug addicts. Classes are free and non-denominational.
If you or a loved one faces misdemeanor or felony charges, contact our California criminal defense attorneys for help. We'd be glad to meet with you for a free consultation at one of our local criminal law offices in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Van Nuys, Pasadena, Long Beach, Orange County, Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino or Riverside.
If you'd like further assistance...
Join us to discuss your criminal case at any of our
local offices: You can also contact us 24/7 at
888.327.4652 for a free consultation
Copyright © 2010 Shouse Law Group - California Criminal Defense Attorneys - Los Angeles DUI Attorney - Drunk Driving Defense Lawyers - All rights reserved.
California DUI Drugs (DUID) Defense Lawyer Disclaimer: The drunk driving defense, DUI, traffic violations breathalyzer, felony, misdemeanor, criminal defense or other legal defense information presented at this site should not be considered formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer or attorney client relationship. Our criminal defense law firm serves the following communities, among others: Los Angeles County, California, Agoura, Alhambra, Bellflower, Beverly Hills, Burbank, Calabasas, Century City, Chatsworth, Compton, Culver City, Diamond Bar, Downey, El Segundo, Encino, Glendale, Glendora, Hermosa Beach, Hidden Hills, Hollywood, Huntington Park, Inglewood, Los Angeles Lawyer, La Canada, Long Beach, Los Angeles Attorney, Malibu, Manhattan Beach, Marina Del Rey, Norwalk, Palos Verdes, Pasadena, Pomona, Rancho Palos Verdes, Redondo Beach, Rolling Hills, San Dimas, San Fernando, San Marino, San Pedro, Santa Clarita, Sierra Madre, Santa Monica, South Gate, South Pasadena, Sylmar, Torrance, Universal City, Valencia, Van Nuys, West Covina, West Hollywood, Walnut, Westchester, Westlake Village, Whittier, Woodland Hills, California, Orange County Criminal Defense Attorney and DUI lawyer for Orange County; Attorney and DUI lawyer San Bernardino County, California, Ontario, Rancho Cucamonga, Fontana, Redlands, Upland, Riverside, Corona, Norco, Santa Barbara County, Santa Barbara.
© 2010 Shouse Law Group. All rights reserved. We employ Copyscape Premium. Any republishing of copyrighted material without the express written consent of the publisher is prohibited. Such plagiarism is illegal, constitutes professional misconduct and constitutes an infringement of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.
Sitemap | Las Vegas Nevada Criminal Defense Lawyers | Español