Every crime in California is defined by a specific code section. Our attorneys explain the law, penalties and best defense strategies for every major crime in California.
A Franks hearing is a legal proceeding in a criminal case where the defense tries to traverse a search warrant. Traversing a warrant means that the defendant challenges the truth of the information that is used to support it. A Franks motion is the legal document given to the judge that sets forth the defendant’s request for a hearing and the specific challenges that the defendant has.
This type of hearing is typically conducted after a search and seizure have taken place. If the defense is successful at the hearing, then the judge will throw out (or suppress) all of the evidence, or some, that was seized under the warrant.
Note that the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution says that a search warrant can only be issued upon a showing of probable cause.
“Probable cause” is a reasonable belief that:
A motion to traverse, then, challenges the truth of the information that tries to establish probable cause for the issuance of a search warrant.
Under California law, the defense can challenge other warrants in addition to search warrants. For example, defendants and accused parties are free to challenge both:
Our California criminal defense attorneys will highlight the following in this article:
A Franks hearing is a proceeding before a judge where a defendant contests the veracity for a search warrant.1 The name stems from a real court case heard by the United States Supreme Court in Franks v. Delaware.
Note that in order to obtain a warrant, a police department officer must submit a search warrant affidavit to the judge. This document gives the reasons why he/she should allow law enforcement to conduct a search. Sometimes an affidavit will include statements from a confidential informant.
If a defendant believes that the affidavit contains false information, then the defendant:
A Franks motion can question the information in the affidavit by showing that:
Note, too, that the motion can show that authorities intentionally left out of the affidavit material information that would have negated the granting of a warrant.3
If the trial court finds the motion persuasive, then the judge holds a Franks hearing, which is an evidentiary hearing held in the judge’s chambers.4
During the hearing, the defense counsel presents evidence for why the search warrant should not have been ordered.
In addition, the judge at the suppression hearing may question the person who wrote the affidavit, who is known as the affiant. The judge asks questions to determine if the affidavit has:
Franks hearings are typically held after a search has been conducted. If the defense sets forth a substantial preliminary showing that the affidavit was false, then the judge may:
The “exclusionary rule” is the law that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in a criminal trial. The rule was established by the Supreme Court in 1961.5
To obtain a lawful search warrant, law enforcement authorities must show or establish probable cause.6
“Probable cause” means a reasonable belief that criminal activity took place or is taking place.
The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution states that:
As to this last requirement, a search warrant affidavit must set forth the following information:
A judge rules on whether there is a finding of probable cause. He/she makes a probable cause determination by analyzing the facts of the case.
Note that there is no one set standard (such as preponderance of the evidence) that a judge will use in determining whether there is or is not probable cause to grant a search warrant application.
Search warrants are issued and signed by a judge.
A judge can only issue the warrant if he/she finds probable cause of a criminal act.
Note that before making this finding, a judge may question:
Affidavits can be written or oral. They can be submitted to a judge either in person or via:
All affidavits are submitted under penalty of perjury.
If issued, a search warrant directs a police officer to command a search for certain things or personal property listed in the warrant.
Defendants can challenge other warrants besides search warrants.
For example, they can contest both:
A motion to quash an arrest warrant is a claim that an arrest warrant is invalid or illegal.
An arrest warrant is issued when a magistrate is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe that a person has committed a crime.8
A bench warrant, on the other hand, is an arrest warrant issued by a judge in court for a person’s failure to appear in court.
Under Penal Code 978.5, a bench warrant may be issued when a defendant fails to appear after being:
To challenge or “recall” a bench warrant, a case needs to be put on the calendar in the courtroom where it was issued. Then an oral motion to quash or recall can be made to the judge.
A judge will recall a warrant if the defendant has complied with the original order to appear.
For additional guidance or to discuss your case with a criminal defense attorney, we invite you to contact us at Shouse Law Group. We appear in district courts throughout the state of California.
A former Los Angeles prosecutor, attorney Neil Shouse graduated with honors from UC Berkeley and Harvard Law School (and completed additional graduate studies at MIT). He has been featured on CNN, Good Morning America, Dr Phil, Court TV, The Today Show and Court TV. Mr Shouse has been recognized by the National Trial Lawyers as one of the Top 100 Criminal and Top 100 Civil Attorneys.
In Orange County, California, the police must file for an arrest warrant against individuals they seek to take into custody. The process of issuing such a warrant is based on a preliminary request of Orange County Police Department and that issued by a judge. In any case, an arrest warrant against an individual is limited ...
Go to the Denver County Court Warrant Search website. Enter your first name, last name, and date of birth to see if there are any active warrants. If you have a warrant, you may be arrested at any time. If the charges are serious, the police may be out looking for you. Otherwise, you risk ...
People can check if they have an outstanding warrant in Arizona by the following four ways: 1. Search court records online A good place to start an online warrant search is with the Arizona Judicial Branch public access case search. It allows people to search by inputting names, birth months, birth years, and specific courts. ...
Today the Supreme Court of the United States ruled–unanimously!–that police cannot search a person’s cell phone without a search warrant. The case was Riley v. California. David Riley was pulled over in San Diego for having an expired registration on his car. The police found loaded guns in his car, and then examined his smartphone. ...