Every crime in California is defined by a specific code section. Our attorneys explain the law, penalties and best defense strategies for every major crime in California.
Employment Law » I have a California marijuana conviction on my record. Should I pursue expungement under Penal Code 1203.4 or dismissal under Proposition 64?
Recently we have written about the possibility of getting resentenced or having your marijuana conviction dismissed and sealed under Proposition 64–California’s recreational marijuana law.
Briefly, Proposition 64 provides that certain marijuana-related activities are no longer crimes–or are less serious crimes than they were before that law was passed. If you were sentenced under the old law, you can have your sentence reduced, or your felony conviction reduced to a misdemeanor. Or, if your offense is no longer a crime at all, you can have the conviction dismissed.
But expungement for certain kinds of offenses was already an option before Proposition 64. California’s expungement law, Penal Code 1203.4 PC, provides for expungement of criminal convictions for defendants in certain situations.
Eligibility for Prop 64 relief vs. PC 1203.4 expungement
For a defendant with a marijuana conviction trying to decide which form of expungement to pursue, the first question is of course which you are eligible for.
In order to have a marijuana conviction totally expunged under Prop 64 (as opposed to merely reduced/redesignated from a felony to a misdemeanor), you need to have been convicted of an offense that is no longer a crime under marijuana legalization. The major offenses of which this is true are:
For you to be eligible for a Penal Code 1203.4 PC general expungement, all of the following must be true:
Benefits of a Prop 64 expungement vs. benefits of a PC 1203.4 expungement
The other consideration is what your specific goals are for the expungement–and which form is most likely to help you meet those goals.
A PC 1203.4 expungement offers several key benefits–most prominently the right to not have the conviction held against you when you are applying for most jobs.
But there are also serious limitations to what a California criminal expungement can do for you. Importantly, it will not seal your record. Anyone who does a background check will still be able to see that you suffered a conviction (though they will also see that the conviction was dismissed).
In contrast, Proposition 64, in new Health and Safety Code 11361.8 HS, provides that a marijuana conviction dismissed under that section will be “sealed” as legally invalid. This means that the arrest and conviction will not come up when someone does a background check and will not be discoverable through other means.
For this reason, many defendants who are eligible for a dismissal of their sentence under Proposition 64 are likely to find that to be a preferable option to expungement under PC 1203.4.
That said, it is best to speak directly with a criminal defense and expungement attorney who can help you evaluate your individual situation and options.
A former Los Angeles prosecutor, attorney Neil Shouse graduated with honors from UC Berkeley and Harvard Law School (and completed additional graduate studies at MIT). He has been featured on CNN, Good Morning America, Dr Phil, Court TV, The Today Show and Court TV. Mr Shouse has been recognized by the National Trial Lawyers as one of the Top 100 Criminal and Top 100 Civil Attorneys.
Gender identity and your rights in the Nevada workplace Both Nevada and federal law prohibit discrimination on the basis of gender or gender identity or expression, including by reason of transgender status or sexual orientation. Gender identity is a person’s internal sense of being male or female. Gender expression includes external personal characteristics associated with ...
Ride-sharing company Uber typically does not allow people with felony convictions to sign up as drivers. But the company announced today that it will hire drivers who were originally convicted of felonies–but whose convictions have been reduced to misdemeanors under Proposition 47. Prop 47, passed in 2014, reclassified several former California felonies as misdemeanors, including: Grand ...
Under Federal law, employers are encouraged to reimburse employees for uniforms or required clothes. But the law does not say that they must reimburse their employees for such costs. In addition, federal law states that employers, who require non-OSHA mandated uniforms, are not required to pay for them if they compensate their employees adequately. Federal ...
Under California employment law, all employers have a legal obligation to pay employees the wages they have earned and to pay these wages on time. This includes the final payment of wages upon a worker’s termination of employment. Per several California Labor Code sections and the state’s labor laws, an employer is subject to penalties ...