A defendant in a criminal case does not choose which district attorney will be assigned. Nor does the defendant have the power to request a different prosecutor. But in most states, the defense can seek to recuse a district attorney (or a prosecuting agency) if there is a bias or conflict of interest.
In California, under Penal Code 1424a1 PC, a criminal defendant can request a different prosecutor when there is a conflict of interest that may result in the defendant not receiving a fair trial. The request is referred to as a “motion to recuse a prosecutor.” If a judge grants the motion, a substitute district attorney is assigned to the case.
Defendants can also try to remove a judge from a criminal case (or even a civil case) per California Code of Civil Procedure 170.1. This statute says that a judge can be disqualified from a case under certain circumstances, like when:
- the judge has personal knowledge of certain facts concerning the proceeding,
- the judge served as a lawyer in the proceeding, or gave advice to a party in the proceeding, and/or
- the judge has a financial interest in a proceeding or in a party to the proceeding.
Jurors are also subject to disqualification. Prior to a criminal trial, a defense attorney can try to remove a potential juror with either a:
- “for cause” challenge, or
- “peremptory” challenge.
Defendants can try to remove a prosecutor, judge, or juror in either misdemeanor or felony cases.
What is a Motion to Recuse a Prosecutor?
A motion to recuse a prosecutor is a legal request made by defendants in criminal cases whereby they ask the judge to appoint a new district attorney (DA) to the case.1
Under California’s criminal law, a judge will grant the motion if the following are true:
- there is a conflict of interest such that there is a possibility the DA will not act in a just manner, and
- the conflict is so serious that it is likely that the defendant will not be treated fairly in all stages of the criminal proceeding.2
Examples of instances in which a judge granted a motion include when:
- a prosecutor tampered with evidence, specifically taking efforts to prevent the disclosure of an alleged sexual abuse victim’s medical and psychotherapy records,3 and
- there was a real risk that a district attorney’s office would be excessively eager in convicting the defendant.4
If a judge grants a motion to recuse, then he/she can remove a district attorney from the case or even an entire district attorney’s office from a case.
If a DA is recused, then another deputy or assistant district attorney is appointed.5
If a DA’s office is recused, then a special prosecutor is appointed to the case.6
Can a defendant try to remove a judge from a criminal or civil case?
Yes. California Code of Civil Procedure 170.1 CCP states that a party to a civil or criminal case can try to remove a judge “for cause.”
Under CCP 1701.1, the “for cause” reasons as to when a judge can be disqualified are when any one or more of the following are true:
- the judge has personal knowledge of disputed facts concerning the proceeding,
- the judge served as a lawyer in the proceeding, or gave advice to a party in the proceeding,
- the judge has a financial interest in a proceeding or in a party to the proceeding,
- the judge, or the spouse of the judge, is a party to the proceeding or is an officer, director, or trustee of a party,
- a lawyer or a spouse of a lawyer in the proceeding is the spouse, former spouse, child, sibling, or parent of the judge or the judge’s spouse or if such a person is associated in the private practice of law with a lawyer in the proceeding,
- by reason of permanent or temporary physical impairment, the judge is unable to properly perceive the evidence or is unable to properly conduct the proceeding, or
- the judge has received a contribution in excess of $1500 from a party or lawyer in the proceeding.7
A judge can also remove him- herself from a case, “for cause,” if for any reason:
- the judge believes his/her recusal would further the interests of justice,
- the judge believes there is a substantial doubt as to his/her ability to be impartial, or
- a person aware of the facts might cast doubt on the judge’s ability to be impartial.8
A party can seek to disqualify a judge by bringing a motion to recuse. If granted, a new judge is assigned to the case.
Can defendants remove jurors from a case?
Yes. During jury selection, a defense attorney or public defender can try not remove a potential juror either “for cause” or via a “peremptory challenge.”
“For cause” means that a juror has expressed a bias and is not suitable to decide the case. For example, the juror may have stated that, based on religious reasons, he/she cannot pass judgment on the defendant. Lawyers are given an unlimited amount of for cause challenges.
If an attorney exercises a “peremptory challenge”, the attorney does not need to state a specific reason as to why he/she dismisses a juror. Each attorney is allowed between six and twenty peremptory challenges in a case, depending on the alleged offenses.9
Note, though, that an attorney cannot remove a juror via a peremptory challenge for reasons related to that juror’s race, religion, gender, or ethnicity.10
Legal References:
- California Penal Code 1424a1 PC.
- See, for example, People v. Petrisca (2006) 138 Cal.App.4th 189, People v. Eubanks (1996) 14 Cal.4th 580, and People v. Connor (1983) 34 Cal.3d 141.
- People v. Superior Court (Humberto S.) (2006) 145 Cal.App.4th 32.
- People v. Vasquez (2006) 39 Cal.4th 47. In Vasquez, the defendant’s mother and stepfather worked in the DA’s office. The court ruled that recusal was proper because the office could act overzealously to avoid the appearance of impropriety.
- California Penal Code 1424a1 PC.
- See same.
- California Code of Civil Procedure 170.1 CCP.
- See same.
- California Code of Civil Procedure 231 CCP.
- See, for example, People v. Wheeler (1978) 22 Cal.3d 258.