Non-U.S. citizens who are convicted of drug crimes face stiff immigration consequences. Simply possessing a controlled substance for personal use (other than a small amount of marijuana) can get an alien deported.
But all hope is not lost. An experienced criminal defense lawyer may be able to negotiate a plea agreement to a charge with fewer -- or even no -- immigration consequences.
And finally, an alien may be able to obtain asylum in the United States or get a hardship waiver to keep from being deported.
To help you better understand the immigration consequences of a drug conviction, our California criminal defense lawyers discuss, below:
- 1. What are the immigration consequences of a drug conviction?
- 2. What drugs can get me deported or deemed inadmissible?
- 3. Controlled substances offenses that can lead to deportation
- 3.1. Possible (optional) removal
- 3.2. Mandatory removal
- 3.3. When is a controlled substance offense a crime involving moral turpitude?
- 3.4. When is a narcotics offense an aggravated felony?
- 4. Can I be deported just for using drugs?
- 5. Will I be deported for possessing drugs for personal use?
- 6. Can I be deported for possessing drugs if I am not convicted?
- 7. Can I avoid deportation by accepting drug diversion?
- 8. Can I be removed for possessing drug paraphernalia?
- 9. What if my offense is vacated, expunged or pardoned?
- 10. How to fight deportation on drug charges
Depending on the specific crime and the alien's legal status, non-U.S. citizens convicted of controlled substance crimes may face:
- Mandatory removal (deportation)
- Optional removal (deportation), and/or
- Inadmissibility to the United States.
An alien who is inadmissible will not get deported if in the U.S. legally. But someone who is inadmissible cannot:
- Lawfully re-enter the country after leaving,
- Become a U.S. citizen (“naturalize”), or
- Apply for lawful permanent resident status (a “green card”) or an "adjustment of status" from illegal to legal.
21 U.S. Code § 802 defines “controlled substance” as any drug (or other substance or immediate precursor) listed in any of the drug schedules in the United States Controlled Substances Act.
Such substances include illegal narcotics such as heroin, cocaine and methamphetamine, as well as prescription medications such as Vicodin and sleeping pills.
Note that some substances may be illegal under state law but not be listed on one of the federal schedules. In order to be a removable or inadmissible drug offense, the crime must involved a substance that is listed on a federal drug schedule.
The government has the burden of proving that the substance involved is included in 21 USC §802.
Non-U.S. citizens who are in the U.S. lawfully face possible deportation if:
- They are a drug abuser or addict, or
- They are convicted of a crime involving a controlled substance (other than a single offense for possessing 30 grams or less of marijuana for personal use).
Deportation of a non-citizen is mandatory after a narcotics conviction if:
- The drug offense is considered an aggravated felony,
- The defendant is convicted of any two or more crimes that carry aggregate sentences of more than 5 years, or
- The offense is a crime involving moral turpitude (“CIMT”) and:
- It is committed within five years of the alien's arrival in the U.S. and
- The crime carries a possible sentence of one (1) year or longer (regardless of the sentence the alien actually received).
Conviction of a drug crime will also make a non-citizen inadmissible to the U.S. regardless of the immigrant's status or how long he/she has been in the U.S.
The U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) does not define “moral turpitude.”
But generally speaking, except for possession for personal use, crimes involving controlled substances are almost always considered crimes involving moral turpitude (“CIMT”).
For instance, drug offenses that have been held to be crimes of moral turpitude in California include:
- Sale of a controlled substance, California Health & Safety Code 11352 HS, and
- Possession for sale of a controlled substance, California Health & Safety Code 11351 HS.
A drug offense is an "aggravated felony" if it would be punishable as a felony (with a possible sentence of more than one year) under federal drug laws.
This is true even when an alien is convicted under state law and regardless of whether the state defines the crime as a misdemeanor or a felony.
The main consequences of having a drug crime categorized as an aggravated felony are that:
- Deportation for an aggravated felony is mandatory, and
- Certain types of relief are unavailable following an aggravated felony conviction, including:
Technically yes, if you abuse drugs or are an addict. As a practical matter, however, the U.S. does not deport lawfully present aliens who seek treatment for drug abuse and have not been convicted of a crime.
But if you are found guilty of -- or you plead guilty or no contest to -- a drug crime, you face possible deportation – even if you are sentenced to and successfully complete drug treatment.
For this reason non-U.S. residents are advised to discuss immigration consequences with an attorney before accepting a plea agreement involving drug treatment.
Possibly. A conviction for unlawful possession of narcotics (other than small amounts of marijuana) makes an alien deportable. In such a case, removal is within the discretion of the immigration judge.
The good news is that simple possession of a controlled substance is not an aggravated felony unless the drug involved is flunitrazepam (Rohypnol).
Under federal law, possession of narcotics for personal use (other than Rohypnol) is punishable by imprisonment of up to a year.
Because it cannot be punished by a sentence of more than one year, possession of narcotics (other than Rohypnol) is not an aggravated felony, no matter how state law classifies it.
Thus a single conviction for simple possession of any drug other than flunitrazepam does not subject a non-citizen who is in the U.S. lawfully to mandatory deportation.
No. But an alien can be deemed inadmissible without a conviction if a consular officer or the U.S. Attorney General has reason to believe the alien:
- Is or has been an illicit trafficker in any unlawful controlled substance or chemical;
- Has knowingly aided someone else in illicit trafficking; or
- Is the spouse or child of a drug trafficker and has within the previous 5 years:
- Obtained any financial or other benefit from the parent or spouse's illicit activity, and
- Knew or reasonably should have known that the benefit was the product of such illicit activity.
Possibly. Under certain circumstances a lawful immigrant may be able to avoid immigration consequences by participating in drug diversion.
In some states, drug treatment is available with pre-trial diversion. In these programs, defendants are not required to enter a guilty plea and thus should not face immigration consequences if they successfully complete the program.
In other states, such as California, drug diversion requires a guilty plea. If the defendant completes drug diversion the charge will be dismissed.
Dismissal of the charge alone does not negate the conviction for immigration purposes.
However – at least as of 2017 – a defendant who participates in drug diversion through California Penal Code 1000 deferred entry of judgment can avoid immigration consequences by petitioning the court to have the conviction vacated.
This relief is not currently possible with Prop. 36 drug diversion.
But... a California drug conviction does not count for immigration purposes if:
- The conviction occurred between 1997 and July 14, 2011, and
- The defendant successfully completed any program of drug diversion without a probation violation.
Non-citizen defendants should always consult with a lawyer who is knowledgeable about criminal and immigration laws in their state before accepting drug diversion that requires a guilty plea.
Possibly, but only if the government can tie the conviction to a specific federally controlled drug.
In practice, a conviction for possession of drug paraphernalia is, by itself, unlikely in to present a problem.
Getting a drug conviction vacated or getting a crime expunged removes most of the consequences of a conviction. Unfortunately, immigration consequences are generally not removed unless the conviction was vacated or expunged due to:
- A serious procedural error that violated the defendant's constitutional rights, or
- Because the defendant completed drug diversion with no probation violation prior to July 2011.
A full and conditional governor's pardon or presidential pardon, on the other hand, will remove immigration consequences.
But a pardon is difficult and time-consuming to obtain. It is much better, therefore, to try to avoid the immigration consequences of a narcotics conviction in the first place.
There are several ways to avoid negative immigration consequences after a drug arrest. These include (without limitation):
- Getting the prosecutor to drop the charges,
- Getting evidence excluded through a California Penal Code 1538.5 PC motion to suppress evidence,
- Getting the judge to dismiss the charges, (for instance, through a California Penal Code 995 motion to dismiss),
- Winning the case at jury trial or trial by a judge (bench trial),
- Obtaining post-conviction relief such as a writ of habeas corpus,
- Successfully appealing the conviction,
- Accepting a plea bargain involving either:
- A charge with few immigration consequences -- such as disturbing the peace, or
- If there is no avoiding it, an offense that subjects an alien to possible rather than mandatory deportation -- such as simple possession rather than possession with intent to sell, or
- In a worst-case scenario, an offense that still allows a hardship waiver or similar relief;
- Fighting the removal order in a U.S. immigration court, or
- Appealing a removal order to the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Arrested for a drug crime? Call us for help…
If you or someone you know was arrested for a drug crime, our California criminal and immigration lawyers may be able to help.
We offer free consultations and reasonable payment plans.
Call us at (855) 396-0370 or fill out the form on this page to speak to a knowledgeable lawyer about your case.
- Matter of Paulus, 11 I&N Dec. 274 (BIA 1965).
- Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA") § 237(a)(2)(B). The INA is codified in Title 8 of the United States Code. INA § 237(a)(2)(B) appears as 8 USC § 1227(a)(2)(B).
- INA § 237(a)(2)(A)(i).
- See People v. Castro (1985) 38 C.3d 301.
- INA § 101(a)(43(B); 8 USC § 1101(a)(43(B).
- United States v. Ballesteros-Ruiz, 319 F.3d 1101 (9th Cir.2003); Cazarez-Gutierrez v. Ashcroft, 382 F.3d 905 (9th Cir.2004).
- Under 21 U.S.C. § 844(a) possession of flunitrazepam is punishable by up to three years in prison.
- 21 US Code §844 (a).
- The term “addict” means any individual who habitually uses any narcotic drug so as to endanger the public morals, health, safety, or welfare, or who is so far addicted to the use of narcotic drugs as to have lost the power of self-control with reference to his addiction.
21 U.S. Code § 802 (1).
- Lopez v. Gonzales, 549 U.S. 47 (2006).
- 8 U.S. Code § 1182 (a)(2)(C).
- See California Penal Code 1203.43 PC.
- Mellouli v. Lynch 575 U. S. ____ (2015) See also Luu-Le v. INS, 224 F.3d 911 (9th Cir. 2000).