Recanting Victims Don't Stop Domestic Violence Prosecutions

Posted by Neil Shouse | Sep 11, 2009 | 0 Comments

California domestic violence laws make it illegal to use violent force (or threats of bodily harm) against an intimate partner. An intimate partner is usually defined as a current or former fiancé, spouse, cohabitant, boyfriend, girlfriend or the parent of your child.

Following a domestic violence arrest, it's not uncommon for the alleged victim to “recant.” For example, suppose neighbors call the police to report that Tom and Sue are in a heated argument. The cops come. Sue has redness on her cheek and tells the officers that Tom had slapped her. Tom gets arrested for domestic battery.

A week later, Sue goes to the police station and changes her story. “I made the whole thing up. Tom never slapped me. I got that swollen cheek when I fell. I don't want to press charges.” Is the case over? Not if prosecutors believe that Sue told the truth the first time.

California domestic violence prosecutions proceed all the time, even with recanting “victims.” It's commonly believed that DV victims are prone to false recantations…because they change their mind, they make up with the accused, and they no longer want to see him prosecuted.

So what if Sue takes the witness stand at trial and testifies that the battery never happened? California Evidence Code 1235 allows the prosecutor to present evidence of her “prior inconsistent statements”…for example, by calling the police officer to testify as to Sue's original story. Sue's prior statements are admissible not just to impeach her testimony at trial, but also for the truth of the matter originally asserted.

The prosecutor would then argue that the jury should believe Sue's original story to the cops…rather than her contradictory testimony in court.

So how effective are domestic violence prosecutions with recanting victims? To be sure, they happen all the time and many result in guilty verdicts. But prosecutors' tasks are usually more difficult when key witnesses don't cooperate.

About the Author

Neil Shouse

Southern California DUI Defense attorney Neil Shouse graduated with honors from UC Berkeley and Harvard Law School (and completed additional graduate studies at MIT).


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Free attorney consultations...

Our attorneys want to hear your side of the story. Contact us 24/7 to schedule a FREE consultation with a criminal defense lawyer. We may be able to get your charges reduced or even dismissed altogether. And if necessary, we will champion your case all the way to trial.

Office Locations

Shouse Law Group has multiple locations all across California and Nevada. Click Office Locations to find out which office is right for you.

Regain peace of mind...

Our defense attorneys understand that being accused of a crime is one of the most difficult times of your life. Rely on us to zealously and discreetly protect your rights and to fight for the most favorable resolution possible.

To contact us, please select your state:

Call us 24/7 (855) 396-0370